The London Games are now over and the final medal tally for Taiwanese athletes was a modest one silver and one bronze — quite a distance from the Sports Affairs Council’s (SAC, 體委會) original estimate. Because of the medal shortfall, there have been calls for SAC Minister Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) to resign.
Nobody is pointing fingers at the athletes themselves. People know that in highly competitive international sporting events like the Olympics, where world-class athletes are pitted against each other, winning medals depends on much more than innate skill, training or hard work: Success or failure also hinges on factors beyond one’s control. A bit of luck helps, too. There is no room for mistakes: Your opponent will take advantage of your slightest error.
Time and again we witnessed how little difference there is between these top athletes. Only last month, world No. 1 tennis player Roger Federer beat Andy Murray in the Wimbledon final. Weeks later, the tables were turned as Murray clinched Olympic tennis gold, defeating Federer in the very same venue. With this defeat, Federer not only had to settle for silver, he also lost out on the opportunity to earn a “Golden Slam.”
Had Taiwan’s Tseng Li-cheng (曾櫟騁), the No. 1 female taekwondo athlete in her weight category, beaten Britain’s Jade Jones in the under-57kg semi-final, things might have turned out very different for her. Had second-seeded Wei Chen-yang (魏辰洋) done a little better in overtime in the under-58kg men’s taekwondo bout, he might have come away with a medal. Unfortunately, Lady Luck did not shine on them that day. Yes, it is frustrating, but that is the nature of competitive sports.
The measure of success or failure for our returning team is not in the number of medals they won, it is in the sheer amount of effort they put in.
Regardless of whether they return with a medal, we should accord our athletes — Chuang Chih-yuan (莊智淵), who was among the top four in table tennis; Chang Ming-huang (張銘煌), who exceeded his personal best in the shot put; Hsu Shu-ching (許淑淨), whose palms were cut and calloused from weightlifting; Tseng, who snatched a bronze in taekwondo from the jaws of defeat; and Hsiao Mei-yu (蕭美玉), who climbed back on her bike and continued the race after she was involved in a pile-up — the respect and encouragement they deserve.
The SAC should review the competitive sports system in this country. It should focus on the selection of athletes, training, domestic and international competitions, promoting the latest developments in coaching and addressing flaws in intelligence gathering and analysis. Special attention needs to be paid to psychological coaching to help athletes cope with daily pressure and to strengthen their determination to win. What we do not want to see more of is news reports about athletes with gold medal potential frittering away their time trying to get their idol’s autograph before a competition. This shows they are not fully focused and that they lack the determination to win at all costs when their moment comes.
Then-SAC minister Chen Chuan-shou (陳全壽) followed through on his promise to resign if Taiwanese athletes failed to win 15 gold medals in the 2006 Asian Games. This time, the SAC forecast a best-case scenario of two golds, one silver and three bronzes, and a worst-case scenario of two silvers and two bronzes. In the end we managed one silver and one bronze. Does Tai really think this “grudgingly qualifies” if we “offset the silver for four bronzes”?
The SAC’s performance can not be measured by Taiwan’s success at the Olympics alone, but the degree to which we fell short of our goals at the Olympics does give us reason to pause. Whether Tai feels this is cause for her to resign is her own decision, but at the very least, she owes the country an apology.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the