The banners, T-shirts and handwritten posters said it all.
“China! Hands off Vietnam!” one read.
“Shame on you, bastard neighbor,” another said.
“Stop escalating, invading the East Sea of Vietnam,” a third declared.
As the protesters weaved their way through the crowded streets of Hanoi, past the peeling colonial villas and upmarket shops, they charged toward the Chinese embassy, where they hoped to make a stand against what they call “China’s constant aggression.”
“I hate China,” one forty-something protester said, his voice hoarse from shouting slogans. “Germany invaded Poland during World War II, now China wants to do the same to Vietnam. History may repeat itself if the international community is not made aware of China’s bullying.”
Tensions between Beijing and Hanoi have mounted in recent weeks over what China calls the South China Sea and Vietnam the East Sea, an area where vast deposits of oil and gas, important international shipping routes and fishing rights are of interest not just to Beijing and Hanoi, but also to Taiwan, Philippines, Malaysia and Brunei.
However, last month’s protesters had only China on their mind. After detaining a group of Vietnamese fishermen near disputed islands this year, Beijing announced that the state-backed China National Offshore Oil Corporation was seeking bids for oil exploration in what Vietnam deems its sovereign waters.
It also declared Sansha City — on tiny Yongxing Island (永興島), also known as Woody Island, in the Paracel Islands (Xisha Islands, 西沙群島), which Taiwan and Vietnam also claim — China’s newest municipality.
The anti-China protest was the third of its kind in Hanoi in a month.
“The territorial ambition of China is a common threat — not only for the Philippines or Vietnam, but for countries all over the world,” said leading economist Le Dang Doanh, a former government adviser who recently signed an open letter calling for China to abandon its “absurd maritime claims” in the region.
Hanoi, 201km from the Chinese border, knows it must play a delicate game. Trade between the two countries reached an estimated US$40 billion last year and analysts say that ties between the authoritarian, one-party states are considerably closer than either government would like to admit.
The seeming standoff has pushed the US into the game, with recent visits by US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta.
Panetta’s visit to Cam Ranh Bay, a US naval base during the Vietnam War, sparked curiosity over the US’ intentions to “protect key maritime rights for all nations in the South China Sea” as it moves 60 percent of its naval ships to the Pacific by 2020.
Carlyle Thayer, a Vietnam expert at the Australian defense academy, said Vietnam was likely to maintain its sovereignty by co-operating — but not aligning itself — with the US, but warned the situation in the South China Sea could worsen before it improved.
“Most likely, an incident will occur from a misadventure of two opposite boats trying to be in the same place at the same time,” he said. “At the moment, there’s enough control [on both sides], but the analysis is that a lot of China’s agencies are acting independently and the central government is having a hard time asserting authority ... the problem is that [neither country’s] crisis management techniques are very good.”
The protests in Hanoi come at a time of uncertainty over Vietnam’s political and social future. Its economy has followed a remarkable trajectory from colonialism and communism through to the doi-moi (opening up, or “socialist-oriented market economy”) capitalism of the 1990s and beyond. Art-deco villas have been razed for multi-story office blocks and gaudy mansions dwarf the avenues of Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi, where men in slacks and women in short shorts and stilettos skittle past in glossy Mercedeses and BMWs.
Here, the rich have become so rich that a Vietnamese businessman recently purchased an entire US town for sale in Wyoming. However, Vietnam is running a huge trade deficit with China (US$1.85 billion in the first two months of the year alone) and its 3 million member Communist Party is struggling to maintain control over its population of 90 million, 70 percent of who were born after 1975 and one-third of whom have Internet access.
Protesters are not just angry about China’s territorial ambitions, but about the gaping rich-poor divide, increasing accounts of police brutality, widening crackdowns on dissent and growing numbers of land evictions and human rights abuses. Reporters without Borders declared Vietnam an “enemy of the Internet” as a decree aimed at making it illegal to post anonymously online means that bloggers particularly are under attack. Facebook is blocked, as are many blogs, and activists claim e-mails, telephone calls and whereabouts are routinely monitored. The Committee to Protect Journalists cites Vietnam as the fourth-worst jailer of journalists in the world.
“Vietnam really is the new Burma,” Phil Robertson of Human Rights Watch said.
Dissident lawyer Le Quoc Quan, one of Vietnam’s most prominent human rights activists, who has been repeatedly jailed and beaten for his democracy efforts, said Vietnam was fighting a losing battle.
“More people know more about their rights, so the more they fight for their rights, [the] more repression, more arrests,” he said. “But an optimistic sign is that people are not afraid.”
While it is hoped a diplomatic resolution over the South China Sea will soon be reached — ASEAN agreed last week to a “code of conduct” that may see negotiations begin with China next month — it is just as likely that tension will continue.
“The problem of China and Vietnam has been a problem for 2,000 years,” Le Dang Doanh says. “If China keeps up the aggression, 1 million [Vietnamese] will take to the streets to protest. You’ll see.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers