The London 2012 Olympic Games have captivated the entire world, yet the UK’s political endeavors which have driven the successful event behind the scenes have received scant appraisal.
The Rome 1960 Olympic Games and the Tokyo 1964 Olympic Games allowed both nations to remove themselves from the dark shadow of defeat after having lost World War II. When Seoul hosted the Summer Olympics in 1988, it provided a huge impetus for the democratization of South Korea, which was part of a global third wave of democratization. When Athens hosted the Summer Olympics in 2004, however, the Greek government invested 8 billion euros (NT$297 billion) in the event, an investment that helped drive the country to bankruptcy five years later. For the 2008 Beijing Olympics, the Chinese government also invested huge amounts of capital in the Games in an attempt to create an image of itself as a peacefully ascending global power, but despite the effort, China’s tainted international image remains.
On the other hand, when looking at the ongoing London Olympics, one notices that a few years ago the British government began to integrate policies of sustainable development, cutting carbon emissions and environmental protection into its domestic and foreign policies.
The London Olympics is one link in this visionary policy effort and it offers a great opportunity to observe the success of the UK’s foreign policy in action. Aside from establishing the Department of Energy and Climate Change, the British government has sent a roving ambassador on a global lobbying mission to promote and participate in international climate change affairs and events.
In terms of building these policies into the London Olympics, the UK also established the Commission for a Sustainable London 2012 five years ago. Some of the more noticeable achievements of these policies include how the Olympic Park, the event’s primary sporting complex, was built on a brownfield site in east London which was transformed into an environmentally sustainable, green site that will eventually be developed into a grand eco-friendly green space for Londoners in the future.
Some of the less apparent achievements of the policy include the introduction of grants to London taxi drivers five years ago, renewing the city’s whole taxi fleet to fuel-efficient gasoline-electric hybrid engines to reduce pollution. Some of the sporting venues were constructed using environmentally friendly materials that can be taken down after the Olympics and reused. In addition, the Olympic Park has also adopted strict measures calling for low-carbon emissions, zero pollution and boosting recycling — all of which make London 2012 the “greenest” Olympics in history.
The opening ceremony of London 2012 gave us a glimpse of the country’s glorious past, including the era of the British Empire. The UK might not be as powerful and prosperous as it once was, but through a transformation of its foreign policy, the country has succeeded in using the Olympics as a platform to promote its ideals internationally.
Compared with the exorbitant amount of money that both China and Greece spent when they hosted the Olympic Games, several times the amount spent by London, the London Games are a major political and foreign policy achievement for the UK and that is something it would serve Taiwan well to learn from.
Liu Shih-chung is director of the research center at the Taipei-based Taiwan Brain Trust.
Translated by Kyle Jeffcoat
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US