On the surface, the eurozone crisis appears to be all about the fallout between national governments. It is creditor versus debtor, north versus south. At the last EU summit, the standoff between Germany and Spain seemed to epitomize that divide.
However, there is another, under-reported story here. It’s less about nation states than about regions within European countries being pulled apart through internal north-south conflicts. In Italy, Prime Minister Mario Monti has talked up his “grave concerns” about the default of Sicily, which Fitch rating agency believes is not “imminent.” Monti’s statement is part of an internal political attack on regional spending and the size of the government payroll in the Mezzogiorno, the Italian south.
There are already growing regional disparities of income within all the high-income countries of Europe. Now they are being driven apart further by the new problem of declining ex-industrial regions, such as the West Midlands in the UK or Walloon Belgium. Some countries are still struggling with the old problem of their laggard agricultural regions, such as Puglia or indeed Sicily in Italy.
Research shows that, on some measures, the internal inequalities are greater in northern countries such as the UK, than in southern countries such as Italy. If one looks at GDP per head for the most affluent region with more than 10 percent of the population (London, including outer London, in the UK, and Lombardia, including Milan, in Italy), the top to bottom inequality is worse in the UK. In Italy the poorest regions, such as Calabria and Campania, have half the income of top regions, while UK regions, such as Merseyside or south Yorkshire, do relatively worse. And 63 percent of the Italian population attains the mean national GDP or better, compared with 32 percent in the UK. These inequalities are growing, despite substantial internal transfers, and are driving the rise of a new regional nationalism all over Europe.
Countries in Europe have always been unhappy in their own way. What’s new is that it is no longer the poorer regions who ask for more, but the richer regions who demand to pay less. This “can pay, but won’t pay” politics was invented in two wealthy regions, Padania in northern Italy, and Flanders in Belgium. Insurgent populist parties Lega Nord in Italy and Vlaams Belang in Belgium mix regional identity politics with electoral opportunism. However, their economic agenda is consistently against metropolitan political elites, and against redistributive tax policies.
As austerity bites, internal distributive conflicts are now spilling over into mainstream politics, especially in federal countries such as Spain, where 17 regional governments manage schools and hospitals and account for more than half of public expenditure. In January this year, the center-right Spanish government made an 8 billion euros (US$9.2 billion) advance so that the regional governments could carry on paying their bills; by April, Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy was threatening to seize budgetary control of recalcitrant regions that were now being told to halve their deficits.
There are echoes of this tension even in Germany, where the regionally based center-right Christian Social Union party (CSU) in affluent Bavaria is learning the new rhetoric. German politics is about coalitions and consensus, which has encouraged external scapegoating of the Greeks. That same tendency has, in the past, discouraged any questioning of internal distribution to the formerly communist east: An issue that is now being raised noisily by the leader of the CSU, who challenges the legality of internal “solidarity transfers” that supposedly cost Bavaria 7 billion euros a year.
Britain looks out of step with the trend towards regional nationalism. However that may only be because our own populist right (UK Independence Party and the Tory back benches) is fixated on repatriating powers from Brussels, while coalition expenditure cuts are already stripping out public employment and welfare benefits and thereby undermining New Labor’s de facto regional policy. If the Treasury presses for another £10 billion (US$15.7 billion) in welfare cuts, how long will it be before an ambitious Tory populist, such as London mayor Boris Johnson, starts to make speeches about feckless northeasterners?
The emerging pattern of the new regional nationalism is profoundly depressing if we set it in a broad historical perspective. Right across western Europe, one postwar legacy of the economically catastrophic 1930s was a reinvention of the nation through social settlements, underpinned by new policies of economic management, regional aid and social welfare (which in the UK meant Keynes plus Barlow plus Beveridge).
Now what remains of those settlements is being attacked by a new regional nationalism of the privileged, often in alliance with the central state. We must begin to understand that governments are not just sites where regional problems are solved, but also where they can be created or aggravated from the center.
This then sets the nationalism of peripheral regions in a new context where again the UK has been slow to catch up with emerging realities. The old framing of the issue is about whether any peripheral region has the cultural identity and economic strength to benefit by cutting loose; and in the UK that makes regional government and devolution mainly a Scottish issue, divisively tied to the electoral fortunes of a nationalist party.
However, the aggressive final dismantling of the postwar settlement in the UK (and elsewhere) reframes the issue. It should put regional nationalism on to a new agenda about defensive options for all center-left parties in the economically weaker regions. The Scots will rehearse old arguments in their upcoming referendum, but it is time for a new argument from Wales, Northern Ireland and English regions such as the northeast and the West Midlands.
Karel Williams is director of the Center for Research on Socio-Cultural Change at the University of Manchester/Open University.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US