Every now and then, an army of experts goes around proclaiming the end of China’s economy. Since the middle of this month, the new song is about China being a bubble and the bubble bursting. Giving the answers right away: Yes, China’s economy is weakening; Yes, there are troubling signals; No, China is not a bubble; No, the bubble is not bursting.
What is wrong with China?
Chinese economic authorities have revised their growth-forecast from 8 percent to 7.5 percent for this year. This rate, taken at face-value, does not mean anything. It is important to compare it with inflation, which has been estimated at between 4 and 5 percent. This leaves room for a yearly real growth rate of about 3 percent. Not bad? Not good.
China needs more than 4 percent-growth to pull its citizens out of poverty and to accumulate capital to invest in all those new branches of innovation and technology in which it aspires to compete. Most importantly, China needs more than a 4 percent real growth-rate to fulfil the Chinese Communist Party’s promise to its people and therefore for the party to stay in power.
So, it is true that China will be facing downturn risks this year. The weakening of its spectacular growth may entail the country getting stuck in the middle income trap. Even a mild recession is possible. However, it does not mean that it will decline or fail.
A bubble? Bursting?
The best definition of a bubble was given by former US Federal Reserve Bank chairman Alan Greenspan when he described it as speculative “irrational exuberance.” This means that a bubble is fundamentally speculative and driven by mostly (macroeconomic) irrational actions. However, China’s economy is the contrary of speculation. Its profit rates — if anything — are lower than the high yields of exuberance. Its economic planning is too rational not to scare notorious risk-takers. The very fact that the whole country is constantly analyzing data and looking for flaws to remedy them tells us that it is not a bubble.
There is value in China. Over the past decades, the country has come a long way. Today, Chinese companies are world-players, universities innovate, the labor-market has know-how, banking and finance thrives and there is a relatively high rate of new investment. China still has strong fundamentals that allow a rational pricing of its assets. Therefore, it is not a bubble and it is not going to burst.
Is anything wrong at all?
Yes, and it is important. China’s remarkable resilience to crisis (so far) and the value it is building up come at high cost. The more the government intervenes to create value and to avert downturns, the bigger the economic imbalance it creates.
First, it is diverting almost all investment into infrastructure, telecommunications and construction. This crowds out more interesting options like technology or pharmaceuticals. The logic is simple: If the government gives me a safeguard to build a road at a return rate of 5 percent, I will not be investing in technology at a rate of 8 percent, but without a safeguard.
This massive accumulation of investment in some sectors not only diminishes capital gains, but also influences the allocation of labor to lesser-paid jobs, therefore keeping the value of labor below the market threshold. These two market distortions ultimately lead to less growth.
Second, China is making its provinces pay for these massive investments. This leads provinces into debt; some have already a debt to GDP ratio of more than 100 percent. If there is anything to learn from Europe: sovereign debt is the enemy of growth and stability.
What does this all mean? China is about to go through a soft-patch. This is not as worrisome as the prophets of doom make-believe. However, the Middle Kingdom has economic challenges that need to be addressed, the sooner the better.
Henrique Schneider is chief economist of the Swiss Federation of Small and Medium Enterprises and a researcher on the Chinese economy.
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China