Every now and then, an army of experts goes around proclaiming the end of China’s economy. Since the middle of this month, the new song is about China being a bubble and the bubble bursting. Giving the answers right away: Yes, China’s economy is weakening; Yes, there are troubling signals; No, China is not a bubble; No, the bubble is not bursting.
What is wrong with China?
Chinese economic authorities have revised their growth-forecast from 8 percent to 7.5 percent for this year. This rate, taken at face-value, does not mean anything. It is important to compare it with inflation, which has been estimated at between 4 and 5 percent. This leaves room for a yearly real growth rate of about 3 percent. Not bad? Not good.
China needs more than 4 percent-growth to pull its citizens out of poverty and to accumulate capital to invest in all those new branches of innovation and technology in which it aspires to compete. Most importantly, China needs more than a 4 percent real growth-rate to fulfil the Chinese Communist Party’s promise to its people and therefore for the party to stay in power.
So, it is true that China will be facing downturn risks this year. The weakening of its spectacular growth may entail the country getting stuck in the middle income trap. Even a mild recession is possible. However, it does not mean that it will decline or fail.
A bubble? Bursting?
The best definition of a bubble was given by former US Federal Reserve Bank chairman Alan Greenspan when he described it as speculative “irrational exuberance.” This means that a bubble is fundamentally speculative and driven by mostly (macroeconomic) irrational actions. However, China’s economy is the contrary of speculation. Its profit rates — if anything — are lower than the high yields of exuberance. Its economic planning is too rational not to scare notorious risk-takers. The very fact that the whole country is constantly analyzing data and looking for flaws to remedy them tells us that it is not a bubble.
There is value in China. Over the past decades, the country has come a long way. Today, Chinese companies are world-players, universities innovate, the labor-market has know-how, banking and finance thrives and there is a relatively high rate of new investment. China still has strong fundamentals that allow a rational pricing of its assets. Therefore, it is not a bubble and it is not going to burst.
Is anything wrong at all?
Yes, and it is important. China’s remarkable resilience to crisis (so far) and the value it is building up come at high cost. The more the government intervenes to create value and to avert downturns, the bigger the economic imbalance it creates.
First, it is diverting almost all investment into infrastructure, telecommunications and construction. This crowds out more interesting options like technology or pharmaceuticals. The logic is simple: If the government gives me a safeguard to build a road at a return rate of 5 percent, I will not be investing in technology at a rate of 8 percent, but without a safeguard.
This massive accumulation of investment in some sectors not only diminishes capital gains, but also influences the allocation of labor to lesser-paid jobs, therefore keeping the value of labor below the market threshold. These two market distortions ultimately lead to less growth.
Second, China is making its provinces pay for these massive investments. This leads provinces into debt; some have already a debt to GDP ratio of more than 100 percent. If there is anything to learn from Europe: sovereign debt is the enemy of growth and stability.
What does this all mean? China is about to go through a soft-patch. This is not as worrisome as the prophets of doom make-believe. However, the Middle Kingdom has economic challenges that need to be addressed, the sooner the better.
Henrique Schneider is chief economist of the Swiss Federation of Small and Medium Enterprises and a researcher on the Chinese economy.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US