This month, summer arrived in Taiwan. Together with the urban heat island effect, its arrival has resulted in temperatures rising to 37oC or 38oC over the past week. For the public this means simply dealing with the scorching heat, but Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) has to worry about the national power supply as power consumption peaks at about noon, when air conditioners everywhere start up. Having been involved in urban heat environment research for several years, I would like to introduce a few different methods for reducing temperatures in urban environments.
First, greenery. Planting greenery is a very important part of reducing urban temperatures thanks to the evaporation and evapotranspiration properties of green plants. This makes planting greenery the primary choice for reducing the urban heat island effect. Not only does it help to adjust urban microclimates, it also cleans the air, aids water and soil preservation, prevents fires, provides habitats and looks good. By creating more urban green corridors by, for example, coordinating plans with the construction of subway systems, cities could achieve several advantages in one fell swoop.
Second, increasing urban water bodies. As water evaporates, it absorbs heat from the surrounding environment and helps lower the temperature. Maintaining or creating suitable bodies of water in the city environment, such as ponds or rivers, or preserving water that seeps into and is stored in the soil, are all ways of how we can take advantage of evaporation from urban water bodies to lower temperatures.
Third, urban wind corridors and using air circulation to remove the heat from an urban area. Urban topography, geographical location or clusters of buildings will create long-term predominant winds, but since air circulation is rarely taken into consideration during initial urban planning, such wind corridors are not included among the main considerations in urban planning. In the vast majority of cities, wind speeds are lower in city centers than in the suburban areas because of the urban fabric and building obstacles. This means that wind fields in cities, with their chaotic air circulation corridors, cannot effectively disperse polluted air and excess heat. The result is that air pollution, high temperatures and the heat island effect problems continue to intensify. If water or green corridors or main roads are properly used to direct the wind, they would effectively help lower urban temperatures.
Fourth, “green” architecture. To reduce high urban temperatures and the heat island effect, cities should make a greater effort to promote “green” architecture. The appropriate control of shade and open windows to prevent buildings from absorbing and storing excessive heat will also help lower urban temperatures. In practice, using highly reflective surface materials on building facades, using as much greenery as possible on buildings — on rooftops and facades — and choosing the best fronting direction for a building and incorporating natural air circulation during the design stage will have a clear effect on lowering urban temperatures.
Fifth, a “green” lifestyle that focuses on energy efficiency in our daily lives. Artificial methods for dispelling heat are one of the main factors behind the urban heat island effect and high urban temperatures, and most of these methods have a direct relationship to our daily energy usage. Part of the energy generated by the electricity, gas and gasoline used by residents on a daily basis will be released into the urban environment as unproductive heat. Add to this the air conditioners that work hard in the summer heat and are a main culprit behind the urban heat effect and high urban temperatures. The question of how to create a “green” lifestyle therefore becomes an important policy as we try to change the global environment and lower high urban temperatures.
Engaging in a “green” lifestyle means trying to lower our dependency on energy use as far as possible. Examples of components of a “green” lifestyle are walking or using bicycles and public transportation instead of driving private cars as far as possible, walking up stairs instead of using the elevator, relying on natural air circulation instead of air conditioners and natural instead of artificial lighting, turning off electrical appliances and water sources when not in use, and working in the daytime to reduce the need for artificial lighting at night.
Although we cannot control the weather, we can use the methods and examples mentioned here to lower urban temperatures. Whether we will succeed will depend on the joint efforts of the government and the general public.
Justin Sun is an associate professor in the Department of Land Economics at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US