The failure of Taiwan’s economy is becoming clearer by the day. The prosperity index has flashed a “blue light” for seven consecutive months and last month exports fell by 3.2 percent for the fourth consecutive monthly drop, making Taiwan the only country with negative export growth among neighboring Asian countries. Not only will it be difficult for Taiwan to sustain economic growth of more than 3 percent, it might even drop to 1.5 percent. Naturally, things do not get so bad overnight: The seeds for this economic downturn were planted when Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp (SMIC) ignored government restrictions and invested in China in 2000.
SMIC was established in April 2000, a month after Taiwan’s first transition of government power, and it invested US$1.48 billion in China. The SMIC did not “sneak” into China, because local media published detailed reports of the company’s establishment and groundbreaking ceremony, which clearly violated government policy, but authorities did nothing. When SMIC founder Richard Chang (張汝京) returned home in December 2001, he even received a hero’s welcome when he gave a speech at National Chiao Tung University.
At the time, public opinion, influenced by a pro-unification media, was strongly in favor of opening up to China, and those in favor of opening up also controlled key posts in the administration of then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
“If we don’t go, someone else will;” “integrate resources to add value;” “division of labor between Taiwan’s and China’s industry;” “build a global supply chain;” “turn Taiwan into the world’s gateway to China;” “take orders in Taiwan and manufacture in China;” “make Taiwan a global logistics center;” “take advantage of China’s rise” — were the slogans of those favoring deregulation and pro-unification activists.
The government held an Economic Development Advisory Conference (EDAC) in August 2001, which the decided to allow 7,078 industrial items to be manufactured in China, including computers. This was the beginning of the decline for Taiwan’s domestic investment and of falling wages. Since wafer manufacturers were not among the 7,078 items a long and intense debate ensued. Six months later, in March 2002, the government decided to allow chipmakers to produce 8-inch wafers in China on three conditions, one of which was that a manufacturer’s 12-inch fabs in Taiwan must have reached mass production for six months. This delayed relocation to China and helped Taiwan maintain its leading role in the sector.
On July 4, a decade later, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co chairman and chief executive Morris Chang (張忠謀) gave a speech entitled “Those who study well should be innovators” at the Industrial Technology Research Institute, saying it was “a myth” that factories were established in China because of low wages. In particular, he used the SMIC case to explain that taking advantage of China’s low wages was not a good strategy for long-term competition, because competitiveness comes from innovation, accurately pinpointing the cause of Taiwan’s economic downturn over the past dozen years.
President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration has further accelerated Taiwan’s economic marginalization and pushed wages back to the levels they were at 14 years ago.
Practice is the sole criterion for testing truth. Fact shows that Taiwan’s economic integration with China is leading Taiwan to its own destruction, as Taiwanese companies lose the drive to innovate and upgrade. Having lost the drive, all those nice slogans ends up being so much empty talk.
Huang Tien-lin is a former presidential adviser.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on Tuesday returned from her visit to the US, where she had met with several US senators and representatives, think tanks, and overseas Taiwanese and Chinese communities, espousing her vision of promoting cross-strait dialogue as a way to evade war. On Monday last week, she sat down with US academic Orville Schell and Asia Society Policy Institute distinguished fellow Daniel Russel. Russel is a seasoned diplomat who has served in positions related to East Asian and Indo-Pacific affairs. At the conclusion of the discussion, Russel employed his considerable diplomatic experience and knowledge
I arrived in Taiwan when I was 18, fresh out of high school and trying to navigate university life. Everything felt unfamiliar. My broken Mandarin quickly revealed what I already knew: I was not from here. When I told people I was from Indonesia, many told me that I did not look Indonesian. This caught me off guard, not because it was cruel, but because of how casually it was said. Sometimes it came with curiosity, sometimes surprise, occasionally admiration for my “fair skin.” More often than not, the people asking meant no harm. It is understandable. I look ethnically
Nearly three decades after the 1997 handover, Hong Kong has become a paradox: a place where financial dynamism coexists with political repression — a reality Taiwan cannot afford to ignore. Despite a sharp contraction of civic freedoms since 2020, Hong Kong remains a major global financial center. It has recently overtaken Switzerland as the world’s largest offshore wealth hub, supported by steady inflows of capital from China and across Asia. The territory continues to serve as a key intermediary linking Chinese firms, multinational investors and global markets. Institutional continuity has played a role. The Hong Kong dollar’s peg to the
In the aftermath of China’s expulsion of the New York Times correspondent Vivian Wang (王月眉), Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Lin Jian (林劍) has publicly and explicitly articulated Beijing’s core thinking on the Taiwan issue. Chinese authorities accused the newspaper of promoting what they called “Taiwan independence fallacies,” and said that its description of Taiwan as a country amounts to a challenge to the “one China” principle. The significance of the incident goes beyond the reporting dispute and has given the international community a window into the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) attitude toward Taiwan. Lin, in a statement, said