On July 7, Matsu residents took a huge gamble by approving a casino resort in a referendum in exchange for an airport expansion project. The approval will accelerate the Cabinet’s completion of a draft gambling bill. However, once the draft is submitted to the legislature, pro-gambling legislators might change it to also lift the ban on gambling on Taiwan proper. If another city or county were to approve gambling in a referendum, Matsu’s dream of an upgraded airport might go up in smoke, and Taiwan’s future will be on the gambling table.
Three years ago, voters in Penghu County rejected a gambling referendum that pro-gambling and then-Non-Partisan Solidarity Union (NPSU) legislator Lin Pin-kuan (林炳坤) had been pushing for more than a decade. Voters vetoed the referendum because the pro-gambling camp had underestimated the power of anti-gambling activists and neglected the need for complementary legal measures. This time around, the situation was the opposite. Local anti-gambling activists were overconfident and underestimated their opponent. It was only a few months ahead of the vote that high school and college students took a brave stand against gambling, and the truth about how casinos have destroyed the local economy in other countries was not disseminated to all residents.
Pro-gambling activists made public statements to the effect that although a casino does not guarantee economic development, it offers an opportunity that residents must seize. Moreover, Lienchiang County Commissioner Yang Sui-sheng (楊綏生) and Weidner Resort Development signed four major assurances, among which the most anticipated was an international airport. This empty promise completely violates common sense, but by linking it to local transportation problems, which frequently bother local residents, it has become one of the main appeals of the casino resort.
Transportation is a public investment that is the government’s responsibility, and it is unthinkable that the government should shift responsibility to a business conglomerate like this. The previously proposed trimaran ferry could cut transportation time by half, to about four hours. Both the NT$1.4 billion (US$46.75 million) budgeted for building the ferry by the Cabinet in 2009 or Yang’s plan to buy a ferry for NT$2.8 billion are more feasible than the airport expansion project, which will cost tens of billions of New Taiwan dollars. The ferry solution would also have a much smaller environmental impact than an airport expansion.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has said that consideration should be given to the question of whether there would be enough tourists to support an international airport, but there has been no sign of any assessment of the social effects. Resolving the dispute between the national and local government by resorting to a referendum is just one more sign of the government’s incompetence.
The fact that many Matsu residents would rather put their trust in gamblers than in the government is an insult to a democratic government. Despite its long-term control of Matsu, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is still unable to propose a correct and feasible development strategy. Instead, it chooses to rely on a corporation establishing a casino resort that might attract corrupt Chinese officials who want to launder money.
This is how far the revolutionary party founded by Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) to uphold his ideals has fallen. How can the KMT face the officers and soldiers who sacrificed themselves in the past?
Matsu is an island rich in mythology, and it could make good use of this fact without having to sell its soul to the Devil. In terms of the environment, the rare and precious “Chinese crested tern” — rediscovered there by a photographer 137 years after it was thought to have become extinct — has been praised as a “mythical bird.” In terms of history and culture, the skeleton of a 7,900-year-old “Liang Islander” (亮島人) was excavated on Matsu’s Liang Island (亮島) in April, and the settlements in eastern Min (閩) style, with their well-preserved architecture, have become a favorite among backpackers. Militarily, Matsu — once a stronghold on the frontline of the Cold War as the KMT government of the time dreamed of retaking China — will become a land of peace when the military withdraws three years from now.
Above all, Matsu is the place where sea goddess Matsu (媽祖) achieved sainthood and ascended to heaven. If this sacred land is handed over to the Devil, millions of Matsu believers will be ashamed. Who should we blame?
Pan Han-shen is a Central Executive Committee member of the Green Party Taiwan.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers