Last month, the news that a 69-year-old farmer attempted suicide because of the delayed delivery of mechanical reapers drew attention to the plight of farmers and revealed the prevailing sense of gloom in the agricultural sector.
A few days ago, a member of Academia Sinica, Chou Chang-hung (周昌弘), warned that the government’s agricultural policies overwhelmingly rely on subsidies and lack long-term planning and vision, which has not only impeded progress in the sector, but also allowed its labor force and production value fall into a downward spiral.
In the past, agriculture was been the cornerstone of the nation’s economy. Rice and sugar were two major Taiwanese exports. Not only was the banana the emblem of Formosa, agricultural goods comprised more than 90 percent of exports in the 1950s.
However, those days have long since passed and the agricultural sector last year accounted for just 1.72 percent of GDP and less than 5 percent of total employment. As for agricultural trade, not only has Taiwan changed from a food-exporting country to a food-importing country, it also accumulated an agricultural trade deficit last year of US$10.18 billion.
The ratio of Taiwan’s agricultural exports to total exports shrank to 1.6 percent last year and its food self-sufficiency rate (based on calories) dropped to 32.7 percent in 2008, lower than Japan’s 41 percent and South Korea’s 44 percent.
Coupled with the recent debate over beef imports containing the feed additive ractopamine and the Dapu (大埔) farmland controversy, the suicide attempt of a farmer is a heartbreaking wake-up call, indicating that the predicament of Taiwanese agriculture may be attributable to misguided policies and long-term negligence, as Chou said. This deplorable neglect of agriculture not only stems from the faulty premises held by policymakers, but may also derive from their lack of understanding about the complex relationship between people and land.
In essence, the significance of agriculture lies in the following indisputable truth: The survival of human beings relies on the provisions of nature. Agriculture provides the majority of life-supporting goods to a society. From a political perspective, every country’s primary task is to supply its citizens with access to sufficient, healthy and affordable food. This prevents famine and thereby reduces the odds of hungry people rioting and staging a revolt against the government. Hence, one of the foundations on which the legitimacy of modern states are built, is that ability of a government to guarantee the subsistence of the people. Far-sighted political leaders with an interest in their political survival rarely overlook the importance of agriculture since they recognize the pivotal role it plays in maintaining peace and political stability.
However, industrialization and, more recently, globalization have given rise to flawed and specious arguments that play down the importance of agriculture. For example, agriculture is now portrayed as a waning industry, which discourages young people from taking an interest in the sector.
Without the input of new labor, we can hardly expect cutting-edge agricultural technologies, efficient managerial skills and modernized marketing expertise to enhance agricultural productivity on their own. Over the years, the government’s policies have not merely failed to reverse this vicious cycle, but have exacerbated the situation.
Additionally, since Taiwan joined the WTO and began implementing trade liberalization, overseas agricultural products have flooded the domestic market and changed the food supply structure dramatically. As extravagant bread becomes the latest fad in Taipei, Taiwan’s consumption of rice, the traditional staple, has dropped significantly. The danger of being a food-importing country is that the government surrenders its responsibility of food provision to capricious international food markets. The 2008 global food crisis demonstrates this point alarmingly well by not only revealing the scarcity in international food markets, but also highlighting the extreme volatility of food prices.
That crisis also made clear that Taiwan, with its debilitating dependence on food imports, is very vulnerable to the consequences of events like droughts in the US or flooding in Australia. Furthermore, international food agencies predict that food prices on international markets are set to remain higher than food prices in 2005. With the rapid economic growth of emerging countries and soaring demand for biofuel, the cost of importing food is likely to increase. In addition, all countries, including food-exporting countries, prioritize domestic food needs over food exports in order to safeguard food security. As a result, Taiwan’s historically unprecedented low rate of food self-sufficiency is precarious and needs to be taken seriously.
Moreover, it is misleading to calculate the contribution of agriculture solely based on a narrow definition of economic output. In addition to providing food, agriculture also serves other functions, such as environmental conservation, ecological protection and recreational activities, which are not been taken into account when calculating agricultural GDP figures.
More importantly, agriculture preserves the way in which people have interacted with nature for generations. While the progress of industrialization has alienated most people from the land and destroyed the subtle balance between humans and nature, villages in the countryside are the last sanctuary for the heart, soul, and spirit of the nation and its people. This explains why many European countries have made enormous efforts to preserve and revitalize agriculture and rural areas.
In the face of strong global competition, agriculture should not just be viewed as an obstacle stymieing Taiwan’s efforts at trade liberalization which sucks up subsidies.
While institutional incentives to elicit private investment and more labor for the agricultural sector remain important initiatives, more public investment and well-planned policies to realize the promising prospects of agriculture should be carried out first. The future of national agriculture not only relies on the political determination of the government, but also hinges on how Taiwanese view their homeland.
Ultimately, the revival of agriculture is a matter of how Taiwanese want their children to grow up, to interact with their environment, to understand their grandparents’ folk stories and to dream about the future.
Eric Chiou is an associate research fellow at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US