Last month, the news that a 69-year-old farmer attempted suicide because of the delayed delivery of mechanical reapers drew attention to the plight of farmers and revealed the prevailing sense of gloom in the agricultural sector.
A few days ago, a member of Academia Sinica, Chou Chang-hung (周昌弘), warned that the government’s agricultural policies overwhelmingly rely on subsidies and lack long-term planning and vision, which has not only impeded progress in the sector, but also allowed its labor force and production value fall into a downward spiral.
In the past, agriculture was been the cornerstone of the nation’s economy. Rice and sugar were two major Taiwanese exports. Not only was the banana the emblem of Formosa, agricultural goods comprised more than 90 percent of exports in the 1950s.
However, those days have long since passed and the agricultural sector last year accounted for just 1.72 percent of GDP and less than 5 percent of total employment. As for agricultural trade, not only has Taiwan changed from a food-exporting country to a food-importing country, it also accumulated an agricultural trade deficit last year of US$10.18 billion.
The ratio of Taiwan’s agricultural exports to total exports shrank to 1.6 percent last year and its food self-sufficiency rate (based on calories) dropped to 32.7 percent in 2008, lower than Japan’s 41 percent and South Korea’s 44 percent.
Coupled with the recent debate over beef imports containing the feed additive ractopamine and the Dapu (大埔) farmland controversy, the suicide attempt of a farmer is a heartbreaking wake-up call, indicating that the predicament of Taiwanese agriculture may be attributable to misguided policies and long-term negligence, as Chou said. This deplorable neglect of agriculture not only stems from the faulty premises held by policymakers, but may also derive from their lack of understanding about the complex relationship between people and land.
In essence, the significance of agriculture lies in the following indisputable truth: The survival of human beings relies on the provisions of nature. Agriculture provides the majority of life-supporting goods to a society. From a political perspective, every country’s primary task is to supply its citizens with access to sufficient, healthy and affordable food. This prevents famine and thereby reduces the odds of hungry people rioting and staging a revolt against the government. Hence, one of the foundations on which the legitimacy of modern states are built, is that ability of a government to guarantee the subsistence of the people. Far-sighted political leaders with an interest in their political survival rarely overlook the importance of agriculture since they recognize the pivotal role it plays in maintaining peace and political stability.
However, industrialization and, more recently, globalization have given rise to flawed and specious arguments that play down the importance of agriculture. For example, agriculture is now portrayed as a waning industry, which discourages young people from taking an interest in the sector.
Without the input of new labor, we can hardly expect cutting-edge agricultural technologies, efficient managerial skills and modernized marketing expertise to enhance agricultural productivity on their own. Over the years, the government’s policies have not merely failed to reverse this vicious cycle, but have exacerbated the situation.
Additionally, since Taiwan joined the WTO and began implementing trade liberalization, overseas agricultural products have flooded the domestic market and changed the food supply structure dramatically. As extravagant bread becomes the latest fad in Taipei, Taiwan’s consumption of rice, the traditional staple, has dropped significantly. The danger of being a food-importing country is that the government surrenders its responsibility of food provision to capricious international food markets. The 2008 global food crisis demonstrates this point alarmingly well by not only revealing the scarcity in international food markets, but also highlighting the extreme volatility of food prices.
That crisis also made clear that Taiwan, with its debilitating dependence on food imports, is very vulnerable to the consequences of events like droughts in the US or flooding in Australia. Furthermore, international food agencies predict that food prices on international markets are set to remain higher than food prices in 2005. With the rapid economic growth of emerging countries and soaring demand for biofuel, the cost of importing food is likely to increase. In addition, all countries, including food-exporting countries, prioritize domestic food needs over food exports in order to safeguard food security. As a result, Taiwan’s historically unprecedented low rate of food self-sufficiency is precarious and needs to be taken seriously.
Moreover, it is misleading to calculate the contribution of agriculture solely based on a narrow definition of economic output. In addition to providing food, agriculture also serves other functions, such as environmental conservation, ecological protection and recreational activities, which are not been taken into account when calculating agricultural GDP figures.
More importantly, agriculture preserves the way in which people have interacted with nature for generations. While the progress of industrialization has alienated most people from the land and destroyed the subtle balance between humans and nature, villages in the countryside are the last sanctuary for the heart, soul, and spirit of the nation and its people. This explains why many European countries have made enormous efforts to preserve and revitalize agriculture and rural areas.
In the face of strong global competition, agriculture should not just be viewed as an obstacle stymieing Taiwan’s efforts at trade liberalization which sucks up subsidies.
While institutional incentives to elicit private investment and more labor for the agricultural sector remain important initiatives, more public investment and well-planned policies to realize the promising prospects of agriculture should be carried out first. The future of national agriculture not only relies on the political determination of the government, but also hinges on how Taiwanese view their homeland.
Ultimately, the revival of agriculture is a matter of how Taiwanese want their children to grow up, to interact with their environment, to understand their grandparents’ folk stories and to dream about the future.
Eric Chiou is an associate research fellow at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers