The approach of Tropical Storm Talim last week had a political effect, which was that a provisional session of the legislature could not be held and was instead postponed until July 20. An interesting question to ask is who lost out from Talim, and who gained from it?
Some people say that Talim helped President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) out of a tight spot. Their reasoning is that if the provisional session had gone ahead at a time when lawmakers belonging to Ma’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) were unwilling to fight for him, then the only motion tabled for the session — a proposed amendment to the Act Governing Food Sanitation (食品衛生管理法) that would primarily affect imports of US beef — would not have passed. If that had happened, Ma’s authority would have once again been badly dented. Now that the meeting can no longer be held, Ma can avoid further humiliation and so, according to this theory, the storm helped him out in a big way.
However, from another point of view, this is not the case. When the extended legislative session came to an end, the US beef issue was still unresolved, so Ma promptly convened a meeting of Cabinet, legislative and party officials and ordered them to immediately hold a provisional legislative session to ensure that the beef additive amendment would be passed. Evidently, Ma was hopping mad. With the provisional session now postponed, Ma’s plan cannot go forward and his calculations have all been messed up.
More importantly, the UN’s Codex Alimentarius Commission, a body set up to protect the health of consumers and ensure fair international food trade practices, will meet in Rome from Monday to Saturday next week. Information currently in the hands of government departments suggests that the commission may make a judgement unfavorable to the leanness-enhancing agent ractopamine. If so, then it can be foreseen that by the time the extra legislative session is held on July 20, KMT legislators will be even less willing to endorse Ma’s position on the relaxation of imports of US beef containing the controversial livestock feed additive.
As the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), it is of course the winner in this situation. The DPP was against holding a provisional session to start with, so its lawmakers are sure to be pleased now that the heavens have lent them a helping hand. In addition, the Codex Alimentarius Commission looks set to give a further boost to those who oppose amending the law. When that happens, even if the KMT and its supporters in the media resort to their old tricks of distortion and vilification, it will not do them any good.
Contrary to weather forecasters’ expectations, Tropical Storm Talim did not do much damage to Taiwan, so it turned out to be something of a tempest in a teacup. Talim created only one disaster area — the area around Ma himself.
As to the issue of ractopamine, is it not also a tempest in a teacup? All the Cabinet needed to do was issue an executive order amending the Standards for Veterinary Drug Residue Limits in Foods (動物用藥殘留標準) and it would have been assured of resolving the problem. Why go to all the trouble of fighting it out in the legislature?
Ma is the one who was determined to do it this way. In his view, his party’s majority in the legislature was so secure it could even force through the Local Government Act (地方制度法) two years ago, so why should the US beef issue be a problem? As KMT Chairman, Ma thought that his party’s legislators would all take the rap for him, just as his former secretary Yu Wen (余文) did over Ma’s special allowance fund when he was Taipei mayor.
Ma, ever incompetent, obviously never thought that KMT legislators would group together and rebel against him, but in the event, they left him to stew in his own juice by telling him that he could repay his debt to the US by issuing an executive order. Contrary to Ma’s expectations, his legislators could not be relied upon to do his bidding this time. So, when the provisional session is held on July 20, it will be as hard to get the amendment passed as it was last time, if not harder.
The Ma administration chose not to use an executive order to begin with, but now that it has run into a snag in the legislature, it may be compelled to do precisely that. The legality of doing this is doubtful, not to mention its fairness.
In sending its draft amendments on beef regulations to the legislature for deliberation, the Cabinet acted in accordance with the Constitution, which stipulates that the Cabinet should be accountable to the legislature and respect the legislature’s right to participate in deciding policy with regard to important national affairs.
Now, with the food sanitation law waiting to be amended in the legislature, the Cabinet wants to circumvent the political body by acting on its own. Apart from the disregard it shows for the legislature, the Cabinet’s approach could well be unconstitutional.
Who would have thought that Ma would get himself into such a stew over something as trivial as US beef? It just goes to show that in the world of politics you can never be sure what is cooking.
Chin Heng-wei is a political commentator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Chinese actor Alan Yu (于朦朧) died after allegedly falling from a building in Beijing on Sept. 11. The actor’s mysterious death was tightly censored on Chinese social media, with discussions and doubts about the incident quickly erased. Even Hong Kong artist Daniel Chan’s (陳曉東) post questioning the truth about the case was automatically deleted, sparking concern among overseas Chinese-speaking communities about the dark culture and severe censorship in China’s entertainment industry. Yu had been under house arrest for days, and forced to drink with the rich and powerful before he died, reports said. He lost his life in this vicious
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
In South Korea, the medical cosmetic industry is fiercely competitive and prices are low, attracting beauty enthusiasts from Taiwan. However, basic medical risks are often overlooked. While sharing a meal with friends recently, I heard one mention that his daughter would be going to South Korea for a cosmetic skincare procedure. I felt a twinge of unease at the time, but seeing as it was just a casual conversation among friends, I simply reminded him to prioritize safety. I never thought that, not long after, I would actually encounter a patient in my clinic with a similar situation. She had
RSS