Hong Kong marks the 15th anniversary of its handover to China on Sunday, but protests targeting visiting Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) will highlight growing misgivings over life under Chinese rule.
The former British colony has reaped great economic rewards since the handover on July 1, 1997, as its finance sector plays banker to China’s boom and its property tycoons cash in on the new wealth of mainland investors.
However, instead of celebrating the relationship, Hong Kongers are expected to take to the streets in their thousands on Sunday to demand greater democracy and rail against Beijing’s meddling in local affairs.
“Civil society is strong and vibrant and vocal, and I guess that is also the product of the attempts to suppress people’s rights,” Democratic Party vice chairwoman Emily Lau (劉慧卿) said. “Because they see the signs, so the people rise up.”
PROTESTS
Hu is due to arrive in Hong Kong today to attend official anniversary events as the communist authorities in Beijing stress unity and stability ahead of their own once-in-a-decade leadership change later in the year.
Police have beefed up security ahead of Hu’s visit, after Chinese Vice Premier Li Keqiang (李克強) was dogged by a spate of protests during his visit last year while journalists and protesters complained of heavy-handed police treatment.
Under the “one country, two systems” governing arrangement, Hong Kong is a semi-autonomous region within China, with its own currency and mini-constitution guaranteeing freedoms and liberties not seen in the rest of the country.
People are free to protest and speak their minds, there are no restrictions on the Internet and many lawmakers are directly elected even if the top leader, known as the chief executive, is picked by a pro-Beijing electoral committee.
Hong Kong’s cherished freedoms were on display earlier this month when up to 180,000 people attended a candlelit vigil to commemorate the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre — a taboo subject in China.
Two weeks ago, thousands more marched through the city center demanding an investigation into the suspicious death of dissident Li Wangyang (李旺陽), a Tiananmen democracy activist who was found hanged in his Chinese hospital ward.
On top of grievances over human rights and democracy, there have also been protests over the widening gap between rich and poor arising from China’s economic influence.
PROPERTY SQUEEZE
Property prices have surged 95 percent over the past five years and swathes of Hong Kong have turned into luxury shopping playgrounds for cashed-up Chinese.
“The heavy economic dependence on the mainland has exacerbated Hong Kong’s inner contradiction,” Chinese University of Hong Kong history professor Willy Lam (林和立) said.
“The ruling sectors — the government, big business — feel they must not ruffle feathers in Beijing so as to preserve the economic advantages, but the intellectuals and the young people do not feel this way,” he said.
Hong Kong’s median home price is 12.6 times the annual median household income, according to research group Demographia. That compares to a multiple of 3.1 in the US and 5.0 in Britain.
Many Hong Kongers, even those in the upper-middle income bracket, can no longer afford to buy their own apartments. Those on low incomes are being pushed into tiny rooms known as “cubicles.”
The property squeeze has fueled anger at Hong Kong’s leader-elect Leung Chun-ying (梁振英) — whose inauguration Hu will also attend on Sunday — who was forced to apologize over revelations of illegal improvements to his home.
Leung’s main rival in the election race, Henry Tang (唐英年), was engulfed in scandal during the campaign when he admitted to having built an elaborate entertainment den below his luxury home without construction permits.
INTERFERENCE
Leung was chosen to replace outgoing chief Donald Tsang (曾蔭權) by a pro-Beijing committee in March, promising to improve governance and uphold the rule of law.
However, the selection of the 57-year-old millionaire property consultant has already attracted protests drawing thousands of people decrying Beijing interference in the political process.
China’s economic heft can be felt in everything from demand for school places, maternity beds and baby formula to the choking smog that often hangs over Hong Kong’s spectacular Victoria Harbor.
Tensions flared in January when a Beijing professor, angered at an online video showing Hong Kongers berating a Chinese girl for eating on a train, called the city’s residents “running dogs of the British colonialists.”
A Hong Kong group responded by taking out a full-page ad in a local newspaper branding Chinese as “locusts.”
A poll released last week by the University of Hong Kong showed mistrust among Hong Kongers toward Beijing at a new post-handover high of 37 percent.
“Hong Kong is going to be a part of China — it’s a part of China, but that integration is going to take 50 years,” said former Hong Kong lawmaker Christine Loh (陸恭蕙), head of the Civic Exchange think tank.
“So where are we? It remains an evolving picture,” Loh said.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers