The UN is a major platform for modern nations to meet and interact with one another, and its main goal is to maintain and advance the most appropriate world order for the international community. The UN deals with a very broad range of topics, and issues related to human survival and development have become largely inseparable from the UN and its associated international agencies.
In the current debate over whether to allow imports of US beef with traces of the leanness-enhancing agent ractopamine, Taiwan would do well to refer to the way the Codex Alimentarius Commission is assessing standards for the drug.
Most people in Taiwan are not familiar with the Codex Alimentarius Commission. The commission was established by the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization and the WHO in 1963 to ensure consumers’ access to safe and good-quality food.
Alongside the rapid development of food technology, the commission has been able to put together a collection of internationally recognized standards, codes of practice, guidelines and other recommendations relating to food, food production and food safety.
This collection of standards is called the Codex Alimentarius, which is Latin for “Book of Food.” It is the most reliable and comprehensive reference for international food policies and food administration standards.
Aside from influencing consumer behavior throughout the world, the Codex Alimentarius provides standards for food manufacturers and processors to follow. It has helped reduce tariff and trade obstacles, thus promoting international trade in food products.
The commission provides its 185 member states (including the EU) and 208 observers with opportunities to discuss and formulate global food safety standards. The Codex system is a major platform for its members to set specific food standards for the international community.
The Codex Alimentarius Commission will hold its 35th session in Rome from Monday to Saturday next week, bringing together academics and experts from around the world, as well as its members and observers, and one of the items that they will discuss is standards for permitted residues of ractopamine.
Hopefully, whatever conclusion the meeting arrives at should help to bring about a consensus in Taiwan and resolve the national debate over whether to allow imports of US beef containing ractopamine residue.
The Codex Alimentarius Commission emphasizes that every person should be able to consume safe, good-quality food. Its purpose is not just to ensure that people can eat their fill, but also to protect everyone’s health rights.
As a member of the global village, Taiwan ought to be part of this important process of establishing international food safety standards, just like other countries.
However, Taiwan unfortunately is not a member state of the UN, so our government does not have the right to participate in the Codex Alimentarius Commission process or to obtain food-safety data directly from the commission. As a result, Taiwan has not been able to keep its food safety standards fully in line with those of the international community.
We must recognize that as long as Taiwan is not a UN member state, Taiwanese will not be able to enjoy the rights and benefits to which they are entitled.
Taiwan’s efforts to become a UN member are a matter not just of politics, but also of Taiwanese people’s quality of life.
Chen Lung-chu is chairman of the Taiwan New Century Foundation.
Translated by Kyle Jeffcoat
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US