Minister of the Interior Lee Hong-yuan (李鴻源) has complained about environmental groups’ failure to support the government’s policy on fuel and electricity price hikes. He is, he says, very disappointed in them.
Increasing electricity prices to make them more adequately reflect cost is necessary if the aim is to promote energy conservation and a more secure society. However, the current price increase policy has some key problems.
First, the public has yet to be told what the price of electricity is at cost. What it does know is that corruption exists within Taiwan Power Co (Taipower), that there are excessively high levels of reserve electricity and that the government has been heavily subsidizing the price of electricity. There has been no investigation into these matters and the government has decided to press ahead with the increases without consulting the public. It really is no wonder that the policy has been so controversial.
Second, on the eve of World Environment Day this year, eco-oriented groups conducted a review of the government’s energy policy over the four years since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took office. They concluded that Ma’s 2008 campaign promise of an energy tax law has come to naught, languishing in the Cabinet, and a greenhouse gas reduction act has been stalled in the legislature because of a reluctance to iron out the all-important timetable and connected targets. Despite all the talk about carbon trading, the government has failed to deliver on the most crucial carbon reduction policy.
It is quite clear that the price rises are being introduced simply to address the losses made by Taipower and have nothing to do with reducing carbon emissions or conserving energy.
Third, independent estimates suggest that, between 2007 and 2010, the government sold electricity to companies below cost price and spent more than NT$230 billion (US$7.69 billion) to provide this subsidy throughout a four year period. Selling electricity at such a low price gave firms absolutely no incentive to save energy. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), a major user of power, has said that its energy-saving policies were primarily due to corporate responsibility, not cost-saving considerations.
In the past, the government consistently denied that it had effected these kinds of subsidies and people are still in the dark as to exactly how much it really paid out. Industry accounts for over half the nation’s electricity consumption, so if prices are raised, the government should first announce how much has been spent on subsidizing enterprises. The price that industries pay for their electricity should be the first to reflect the increases.
Finally, if the government really intended the price increases to suppress demand for electricity it should have looked at Germany, where the government has announced zero, or even minus, growth in electricity consumption as a policy goal. Taipower, on the contrary, has plans to expand its electricity output over the next 18 years to cater to ever-increasing demand.
In addition to seven new power plants, with a combined budget of NT$916 billion, it also wants to build another 20 coal-fired units and 22 gas-fired units. It obviously sees the public as a cash cow and this is completely at odds with government policy.
It is only fair that electricity prices are allowed to increase by a reasonable amount. However, in the absence of any information given on the true costs of power generation, with no debate with society or a new energy resource policy, the increases are clearly effected simply to make up for Taipower’s losses.
When the government has these kinds of policies, it is hard to see how environmental groups are going click the “like” button.
Lee Ken-cheng is director of Mercy on the Earth, Taiwan.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers