The torrential rains this week revealed that many parts of the country remain very vulnerable to the forces of nature. In central and southern Taiwan, the storm destroyed bridges and seriously damaged roads, with casualties reported from landslides and flash floods. In the north, the public witnessed extensive flooding, which inundated homes and vehicles and damaged roads following an overnight deluge on Tuesday.
However, while one may quickly blame Mother Nature for spewing fury and showing no mercy over vast swathes of land, there are always actions people could take to prepare for such calamities, hence the role of the government, whose priority should be to protect the public’s well-being and keep people from harm by mitigating dangers and damage efficaciously and expeditiously.
In light of the floods and mudslides that continue to affect parts of the nation, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) on Tuesday directed government agencies to keep abreast of the latest developments and reiterated vigilance and the importance of disaster-prevention preparation.
It is comforting to see the president appearing to be aware of the emergency situation confronting people, especially those residing in flood-hit and disaster-prone areas. In view of Ma’s words of concern for the public, however, one cannot help but wonder why he was so reluctant to suggest to Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers to agree to the opposition’s call for an early legislative recess so that lawmakers could return to their constituencies and lend a helping hand to victims whose homes have been battered by the rains.
The current legislative session ends tomorrow, with the opposition planning to force the Ma administration to withdraw such unpopular policies as the electricity rate increases and plans to ease import restrictions on beef containing residues of the animal feed additive ractopamine. The beef issue has obviously warranted urgent attention from Ma, prompting him to instruct KMT lawmakers — in his capacity as KMT chairman — to give their full support to a vote that would ease the ban.
If the president is truly sincere in his concern for the people affected by the deluge, he could have easily made a similar suggestion to the party’s lawmakers to first put aside the disputes on the legislative floor, thus bringing an end to the legislative session and enabling the lawmakers to attend to disaster relief work in their constituencies. The absence of such actions has disturbed many, leaving some to wonder whether pushing through a draft relaxing the ban on beef containing ractopamine constitutes an issue more worthy of the president’s attention than the well-being and safety of his people.
Prevention is better than cure. Well-considered preventative measures are always far preferable to post-disaster relief work. The last thing the public wants to hear from Ma is that “things are unpredictable (世事難料)” — a hot phrase of late for the president — when disaster strikes and the government fails to avert potential damage to lives and property as a result of its perfunctory attitude to potential dangers.
As the saying goes: “Better late than never.” With typhoon season around the corner, it is to be hoped that Ma and all his officials will treat this week’s torrential rains as a wakeup call, correct their mindset and implement every conceivable preventative measure possible before the next natural disaster strikes.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS