The torrential rains this week revealed that many parts of the country remain very vulnerable to the forces of nature. In central and southern Taiwan, the storm destroyed bridges and seriously damaged roads, with casualties reported from landslides and flash floods. In the north, the public witnessed extensive flooding, which inundated homes and vehicles and damaged roads following an overnight deluge on Tuesday.
However, while one may quickly blame Mother Nature for spewing fury and showing no mercy over vast swathes of land, there are always actions people could take to prepare for such calamities, hence the role of the government, whose priority should be to protect the public’s well-being and keep people from harm by mitigating dangers and damage efficaciously and expeditiously.
In light of the floods and mudslides that continue to affect parts of the nation, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) on Tuesday directed government agencies to keep abreast of the latest developments and reiterated vigilance and the importance of disaster-prevention preparation.
It is comforting to see the president appearing to be aware of the emergency situation confronting people, especially those residing in flood-hit and disaster-prone areas. In view of Ma’s words of concern for the public, however, one cannot help but wonder why he was so reluctant to suggest to Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers to agree to the opposition’s call for an early legislative recess so that lawmakers could return to their constituencies and lend a helping hand to victims whose homes have been battered by the rains.
The current legislative session ends tomorrow, with the opposition planning to force the Ma administration to withdraw such unpopular policies as the electricity rate increases and plans to ease import restrictions on beef containing residues of the animal feed additive ractopamine. The beef issue has obviously warranted urgent attention from Ma, prompting him to instruct KMT lawmakers — in his capacity as KMT chairman — to give their full support to a vote that would ease the ban.
If the president is truly sincere in his concern for the people affected by the deluge, he could have easily made a similar suggestion to the party’s lawmakers to first put aside the disputes on the legislative floor, thus bringing an end to the legislative session and enabling the lawmakers to attend to disaster relief work in their constituencies. The absence of such actions has disturbed many, leaving some to wonder whether pushing through a draft relaxing the ban on beef containing ractopamine constitutes an issue more worthy of the president’s attention than the well-being and safety of his people.
Prevention is better than cure. Well-considered preventative measures are always far preferable to post-disaster relief work. The last thing the public wants to hear from Ma is that “things are unpredictable (世事難料)” — a hot phrase of late for the president — when disaster strikes and the government fails to avert potential damage to lives and property as a result of its perfunctory attitude to potential dangers.
As the saying goes: “Better late than never.” With typhoon season around the corner, it is to be hoped that Ma and all his officials will treat this week’s torrential rains as a wakeup call, correct their mindset and implement every conceivable preventative measure possible before the next natural disaster strikes.
Taiwan might just give up. That’s the argument Simon Shuster made in The Atlantic’s October issue. The US is unreliable, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) leadership is aligned with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and Taiwan does not have the military capability to defend itself in a prolonged war without help. What hope does Taiwan have? Quite a bit more, in fact, than Shuster lets on. Shuster points to genuine problems. The first Donald Trump administration had a mostly positive record on Taiwan policy. It regularized the arms sales process, enhanced the military-to-military relationship, and treated Taiwan more like a normal
A Facebook post by Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) earlier this month achieved record levels of engagement — although perhaps inadvertently. In it, he attacked Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator and Taipei mayoral candidate Puma Shen (沈伯洋) for an op-ed published in 2014 discussing drug harm reduction policies. In attempting to stir up fear with talk of community centers, drugs and needles, Chiang’s comment section exploded. More than 100,000 comments poured in within the first two hours; more than 330,000 after the first 12; and more than 400,000 by noon the following day. Rather embarrassingly, many commenters made a point
Southeast Asian food delivery platform Grab Holdings Ltd in March applied to acquire Delivery Hero SE’s Foodpanda operations in Taiwan, with the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) scheduled to announce its decision on Oct. 27. On the surface, the deal is a business merger — but in substance, it involves personal data, national geospatial information and digital sovereignty. It cannot be assessed solely in terms of market share and price competition. Grab has extensive and long-standing connections to Chinese capital. In 2015, Chinese ride-hailing firm Didi Chuxing and China Investment Corp, a sovereign wealth fund, invested in Grab. Grab invested in Chinese autonomous-driving
With the Taipei mayoral election quickly heating up, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) campaign team has finally started to get serious this month, but a major mudslinging initiative and several sloppy mistakes have drawn a larger wave of public criticism, while sporadic municipal issues continue to crop up, raising concerns about whether the city government’s wheels are coming off. Just a few months ago, Chiang of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was widely expected to win handily in Taipei, traditionally a political stronghold for the KMT and with no major third-party candidates this year. KMT supporters regarded him as a frontrunner