A few days ago, Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (胡志強) said that “gambling is a new vacation concept for the whole family.” When an anti-gambling organization issued a recorded video rebuttal, Hu obstinately stuck to his guns, saying that “gambling is still common in our society, but if we bring it into the area of normal and legally regulated activities, we generally refer to it as ‘gaming.’”
To publicly endorse casino gambling in the run-up to a July 7 referendum in Matsu on whether to allow casinos there seems to be an ill-intended attempt to turn Taiwan into an offshore money laundering center for China.
To support his point of view, Hu used Las Vegas as an example, saying that the US city cleaned up its casinos and turned the place into a family holiday resort during the 1990s. However, the MGM Grand Adventures Theme Park, which represented the biggest investment, was in trouble after only nine months.
In 2009, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) promoted a referendum on gambling in Penghu on the condition that gambling would not be legalized on Taiwan proper under Ma’s watch. Hu, however, thinks that “we should not look upon ‘gaming’ as some kind of ‘compensation’ and only allow the establishment of special zones in more slowly developing areas,” and is thus promoting the establishment of a special gambling district in Greater Taichung. The intent behind the text which would allow gambling in the Offshore Islands Development Act (離島建設條例) is finally revealed.
Due to its own incompetence, the KMT-run central government hopes a benevolent China will come to its rescue, and in the same way, because it is unwilling to improve transportation on Matsu, it now hopes big business will do so as part of their casino developments.
In terms of controlling law and order at casinos, Hu, who lacks all ability to maintain law and order in his city, is the least qualified of all mayors to promote casinos. The lethal shooting of alleged gang leader Weng Chi-nan (翁奇楠) in 2010 seemed to involve top city government officials and the case still has not been solved satisfactorily.
The publication of a survey into government efficiency revealed that Greater Taichung ranked lowest in terms of law and order, fire prevention and transportation, and fourth from the bottom in education. Netizens joke about a Greater Taichung hotel that opened a school by calling it “vertical integration.” One can only wonder if Hu’s single-minded push to allow gambling is also an attempt at “vertical integration” by creating a positive effect for the peripheral businesses surrounding the gambling industry.
The popular movement against gambling managed to win the battle in the Penghu gambling referendum three years ago and it embarrassed Ma, who has never dared to broach the subject since. However, the Matsu gambling referendum next month will see the gambling industry sink its teeth into local councils with councilors broaching the subject during interpellations and mayors responding by giving their support to gambling initiatives. Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chu (陳菊) had barely stepped down from her post as interim Democratic Progressive Party chairperson before she announced her support for developing a gambling tourism industry. Is this the policy direction of the nation’s biggest opposition party?
One can only wonder if Tainan Mayor William Lai (賴清德) will remain true to the anti-gambling stance he took as a lawmaker. At this crucial moment in time, voters will pay close attention to whether their politicians back the right side.
Pan Han-shen is the spokesman for the Green Party Taiwan.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS