It looked like a textbook win-win deal when Australian high-speed ferry designer AMD Marine Consulting formed a joint venture in 1993 with the engineering arm of a state-owned Chinese shipbuilder.
The joint venture partner, Guangzhou Marine Engineering Corp, a subsidiary of the giant China State Shipbuilding Corp, gained access to state-of-the-art technology in wave-piercing, aluminum-hull designs.
For AMD, a private Sydney-based company, the payoff was a foothold in China’s maritime market during a period of rapid growth.
The joint venture, Seabus International Co, began designing high-speed aluminum catamaran ferries and sea rescue vessels for China’s inland and coastal waters, according to the company’s Web site.
That was when a third winner emerged.
Attracted to the performance of these fast, stable and relatively cheap vessels, the Chinese military adopted the technology as it began replacing its aging missile boats that had been derived from an obsolete Soviet design.
The new fleet of missile boats are part of a naval buildup that backs up China’s claims to islets and reefs in the South China Sea, waters rich in oil and gas and which half the world’s ship tonnage passes through each year.
This growing military muscle has prompted the US to make a strategic shift toward Asia.
US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, on his first visit to the region since announcing that shift in January, was scheduled to brief allies about it over the weekend, beginning with “The Shangri-La Dialogue.” The event brings together senior civilian and military chiefs from nearly 30 Asia-Pacific states to foster security cooperation and takes its name from the host Singapore hotel.
Since 2004, the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) has deployed a rapidly expanding fleet of heavily armed, Houbei class fast-attack missile boats based on AMD’s advanced catamaran hull.
In a clear demonstration of the value of foreign dual-use technology in China’s rapid military buildup, the Houbei class or Type-022 as it is also known, appears to be adapted from the AMD 350 patrol boat design, Chinese and Western analysts say.
However, AMD’s technical director, Allan Soars, said the Australian company was not involved in the design of the missile craft.
He said after the joint venture company Seabus International had designed some fast ferries it appeared the PLAN had decided the company’s wave piercing technology would make a good platform for a military vessel.
“I have no knowledge of the mechanisms at play, but it would appear that Seabus International was co-opted by the PLAN to design the vessel platform,” Soars said. This was not done at the Seabus International offices, but at a military establishment.
“The whole process was carried out in secrecy and under strict confidentiality agreements directly with the Seabus International staff who are all Chinese nationals,” he added.
In its annual report on the Chinese military, the Pentagon said last month the Chinese navy had deployed about 60 of the Houbei class patrol craft.
“These boats have increased the PLA Navy’s littoral warfare capabilities,” the Pentagon said.
The US is also beefing up its littoral warfare capabilities in the region. The USS Freedom, the first in a new class of combat ships, will be sent to Singapore next year.
The smaller, shallow-draft ships are intended for operations close to shore and capable of deploying quickly in a crisis. Singapore has discussed hosting up to four such US “Littoral Combat Ships” on a rotational basis at its naval facilities.
From putting marines in northern Australia, stepping up military ties with Vietnam and strengthening its long-standing alliance with the Philippines, Washington has quickly begun executing the “Asian pivot.”
In the report, the Pentagon said China’s defense and civilian sectors work in close cooperation to incorporate technology that could accelerate military modernization.
The cumulative effect of dual-use technology transfers, particularly from the US, could make a substantial contribution to Chinese military firepower, it said.
The mass production of the Type-022 suggests the Chinese navy believes these vessels will complement its so-called “anti-access” strategy aimed at keeping foreign forces away from waters surrounding Taiwan in time of conflict, said Sam Roggeveen, an analyst and commentator at the Sydney-based Lowy Institute for International Policy, an independent private foreign policy research group.
“China’s anti-access capabilities are now such that it would be very difficult for the US Navy to intervene in a conflict over Taiwan at an acceptable cost,” Roggeveen said. “The Type-22 has made a contribution to that capability.”
Some analysts forecast the Chinese navy will take delivery of up to 100 of these vessels, which carry an estimated price tag of about US$15 million each.
No one has suggested AMD Marine Consulting has done anything illegal. Under Australian law, exporters of military equipment must seek government approval for foreign sales, but these restrictions do not apply to work done by Australian company subsidiaries operating offshore.
Soars said the advantage of AMD’s wave piercing hull design was that it delivered exceptional sea keeping qualities, allowing smaller vessels to sail into rough water.
“While the military could obviously afford larger vessels we speculate that they wanted to keep the vessel size down to minimize radar signature, although we cannot rule out cost considerations given the number of vessels,” he said.
An Australian company is also providing aluminum hull design technology to the US military. Western Australian shipbuilder Austal has won contracts to design and build a new class of littoral combat ship and high-speed transport catamarans for the US Navy.
Despite bans on Western weapons sales to China that have remained in place since the 1989 Tiananmen massacre, Beijing has mounted a rapid military build-up that has made the PLA increasingly capable of challenging the military dominance the US has enjoyed in Asia since the end of the Cold War.
Average annual increases of almost 12 percent in military spending over more than two decades have allowed China to deploy an expanding force of potent warships and submarines, long-range strike aircraft, missiles and modernized nuclear warheads.
Early in this period, China relied heavily on imports of Russian weapons, but this has slowed as the domestic arms industry gears up to build more locally designed hardware.
As part of this shift, dual-use technology from abroad has been crucial to advances across a broad range of China’s military technologies including satellites, communications networks, helicopters, radars, marine engines, signals processing and training simulators, military analysts say.
China’s state-owned commercial shipbuilders, who also deliver warships for the navy, have been at the forefront of absorbing foreign technology.
The link between AMD’s designs and the Chinese navy was first reported in 2007 in SIGNAL Magazine, a Fairfax, Virginia-based specialist defense technology publication. Roggeveen also reported on the deal in a Lowy Institute blog.
Since then, the expanding Houbei class fleet has become a top priority for China’s military with mass production involving up to five shipyards, defense experts say.
With an estimated top speed of more than 36 knots (66.6 kms per hour), the 225 tonne boats were clearly designed for offensive missions where they would attack with their YJ-83 anti-ship missiles, which can strike targets at a distance of more than 200 km, experts say.
They also appear to be equipped with advanced data processing links so these missiles can be directed from sensors on other aircraft or ships.
The Type-22 also has a close-in weapon system for defense against incoming missiles and what appears to be a launcher for anti-aircraft missiles.
Naval strategists suggest that deployed in big numbers in wartime, these fast and stealthy craft could overwhelm bigger and much more expensive enemy warships with waves of missiles fired from different directions.
Combined with missiles from China’s land-based launchers, surface warships, submarines and strike aircraft, these attacks could sharply raise the stakes for an enemy operating close to the mainland.
“This craft is a purebred ship killer, perhaps even a carrier killer,” wrote John Patch, a retired US Navy officer in an article for the US Naval Institute.
In its report on China, the Pentagon said it would continue with efforts to block the transfer of important technology to China that would contribute to China’s defense industry and military firepower.
However, for the US and its allies, it could be difficult to evaluate which technologies or materials should be restricted, according to military analysts, particularly for countries that benefit from close trading relationships with China.
“If you were going to be terribly rigid about this, you’d argue that Australian iron-ore exports indirectly benefit the PLA and thus should be stopped,” said Roggeveen said.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers