In President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) inauguration address he talked about “enhancing the drivers of economic growth,” emphasizing that it was important to “speedily complete follow-up talks under the cross-strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement [ECFA].” Ma also said he would “expedite negotiations on economic cooperation agreements with important trading partners like Singapore and New Zealand.” However, these two policies expose the contradictions inherent in the Ma administration’s overseas trade strategy.
Because of the age-old political sovereignty dispute, China continues to obstruct Taiwan’s attempts to sign free-trade agreements (FTAs) with other countries in an effort to isolate the nation economically.
In addition, follow-up ECFA talks on a bilateral investment agreement aimed at guaranteeing investments have been delayed by disagreements over dispute resolution mechanisms, jurisdiction and place of arbitration, all of which involve sovereignty.
Meanwhile, China has negotiated and signed duty-free FTAs with the ASEAN, Japan, South Korea and other countries, which has turned the ECFA into an empty framework, leaving no room to offer Taiwan further benefits from the agreement.
Take, for example, data running from January to last month. These show that exports from Taiwan to China dropped by 6.1 percent, while South Korean exports increased by 4.3 percent during the same period. For Taiwan, the ECFA is nothing but an agreement to become a economic colony of China.
Even more concerning, the government has misjudged the changes in China’s economic situation. If Taiwan continues to invest in China, it will be tantamount to putting all the our eggs in one basket, and a broken basket at that.
China, which joined the WTO more than a decade ago, is still reluctant to use research, development and innovation to upgrade its industry. Instead it is dumping duplicated cheap goods in both the European and US markets. This month, the US Department of Commerce decided to impose high anti-dumping tariffs of between 31.22 and 250 percent on companies importing solar power batteries from China, and that was just one of many punitive measures.
In addition to US sanctions on Chinese exports, Europe’s purchasing power has fallen as a result of its debt crisis. Unable to rely on the European and US markets, Beijing is now trying to switch from an export-oriented economy to an economy oriented toward domestic demand.
However, China’s domestic market also faces three major issues. First, increasing wages means that it is becoming less competitive as a factory to the world. Second, its wealth gap is too wide and its middle class is still not large enough to support the domestic market. Third, local government suffers from severe corruption problem at every level.
According to a March report released by the American Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai, commencing this year, some foreign companies in China are adopting a “China plus one” strategy when establishing factories. This means that, in addition to their factories in China, they are establishing other plants in Southeast Asian countries. If everything goes well in the alternate nations, they may even relocate their factories from China wholesale. This development has been well received by the ASEAN countries.
The world’s factory is relocating and the Ma administration needs to pay close attention to the situation as it unfolds, that includes not misjudging the economic situation in China.
Hung Chi-kune is a member of the Democratic Progressive Party’s Central Executive Committee.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS