Government efficiency is crumbling, as seen in the poor level of communication within and between government agencies. The Cabinet’s recent lack of contact with legislators as it sought to push a series of major policies through the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-dominated legislature — including relaxing the import ban on US beef containing residues of the leanness-enhancer ractopamine — shows its inability to communicate.
The fallout from this will paralyze the government, just at the time when the country’s flagging economy needs all the strength it can get.
On Friday, Minister of Finance Christina Liu (劉憶如) said she would not have been in a hurry to push for the enactment of her capital gains tax on securities transactions, had she known the Cabinet was planning to raise electricity rates and abolish fuel subsidies at the same time.
Unbelievably, her tax proposals were finalized without thorough discussions among government officials — it only took two weeks for the Cabinet to rubber-stamp Liu’s proposal to place a 15 percent tax on securities transaction gains.
Given that Liu is under heavy attack from all sides, it is understandable that she would try to defend herself and her taxation proposal, in the name of seeking a fairer tax system, but more importantly, her inappropriate comments highlight the government’s complete disarray — from the formation of policy through to the ratification of related rules and then the final enforcement.
The confusion over the government’s fiscal plans before the implementation of a capital gains tax, no matter which version is finally adopted, has helped send the TAIEX to its lowest level since Jan. 3. At the same time there are escalating worries that the Greeks may exit the eurozone, while Spain faces an uncomfortable credit crunch.
The capital gains tax is not the sole issue which has plagued President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration recently. The government’s disorganization has been seen in the way it has handled a series of issues, including economic talks with Taiwan’s major trading partners.
Council for Economic Planning and Development Minister, Yiin Chii-ming (尹啟銘) recently opted to give his indirect advice to the government by posting an article on the Web in which he urged stepping up talks with China on the opening up of markets for key items, based on the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), alongside free-trade talks with China’s trading partners.
In Yiin’s mind, it seems to be a useful approach to shout openly at the Ministry of Economic Affairs and related government agencies to force them to take the issue seriously, rather than go through closed door, fruitless discussions.
Yiin sees deepening trade ties with China via the ECFA as an effective way to fend off growing competition from Japan and South Korea, given that the two countries are likely to wrap up free-trade agreements (FTA) with China within next the next two years. These trade pacts will offset the benefits of the ECFA for local companies, Yiin implied.
The FTAs could lessen exports by as much as 4 percent, or US$15.9 billion a year, according to a forecast by the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
The government has said that the signing of the ECFA will help Taiwan push for more FTAs with its trade partners, but not a single trade pact has been signed since the ECFA was inked two years ago.
All this comes with South Korea racking up trade agreements with the EU and the US. Evidently, the Seoul government is much more efficient at pushing policies that boost South Korea’s competitiveness than Taipei is.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers