A few days ago the legislature’s Internal Administration Committee discussed amendments to the Civil Servants Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法). One of the items up for discussion was lowering the threshold for state subsidies for political parties. The law says a party must obtain at least 5 percent of the total vote in national elections to qualify for a subsidy. Legislators have proposed reducing this threshold to between 1 percent and 2 percent. On the morning of the committee meeting, opposition legislators, representatives of small parties and pro-reform civic groups held a press conference calling for an even lower 0.5 percent threshold, which Germany uses.
The reason subsidies are given to political parties is to ensure they do not become over dependent on specific donors, which could cause them to focus on policies that favor minority interests instead of the interests of the nation as a whole.
In Germany, for example, the threshold for parties to win party-list seats in parliament, ie, through proportional representation, is for them to receive 5 percent of party votes across the nation. This is the same level as in Taiwan, but Germany’s subsidies threshold is 0.5 percent.
The reason for this lower threshold is to give small parties that have not won any seats sufficient resources to go on functioning and compete with the big parties. This gives such parties a chance to grow or recover and enables them to oversee policies from the sidelines. This is what has enabled Germany’s Greens, which advocate ecologically sound policies, and the Pirate Party, which is opposed to intellectual property rights that favor corporations, to gradually make gains in elections and stand against corporate-backed politicians. As a result, these smaller parties have been able to promote numerous reforms that have changed Germany and influenced the world.
In contrast, Taiwan only gives subsidies to parties if they win seats, which is rather like throwing life rings to people who have already swum to shore. The small parties are left to drown.
The reason small parties are small is because they do not have enough resources to market themselves to the public. In addition, the low number of votes they win in elections is often the result of tactical voting, not because few people support their political views.
Taiwan’s main parties receive more than NT$500 million (US$16.92 million) a year in subsidies, but they just get spent the next time there is an election. If the vote threshold for subsidies were lowered to 1 percent, the state would only have to spend an extra NT$30 million a year, and if it were set at 0.5 percent, the extra outlay would be just NT$40 million. Either way, it would be an insignificant amount compared with the largesse the big parties receive.
Of course this still constitutes an increase in government expenditure. However, if small parties can use their subsidies to keep themselves afloat, oversee government policy and maybe eventually win seats, then they will be able to keep fighting against the big parties that receive corporate donations. That would allow them to promote demands that are more progressive than those endorsed by the big parties and help improve people’s lives.
Small parties can also keep an eye on how taxes are spent. Last year the legislature approved the the central government budget totaling NT$1.9 trillion. With the the big parties dominating, it only cut NT$130 million.
It would be preferable if small parties could get seats in the legislature, or at least exercise effective oversight from the sidelines. Seen from this point of view, subsidies for smaller parties would be not just an extra expense, but an investment in everybody’s future.
Jia Bo-kai is secretary of the Green Party Taiwan’s Danhai chapter.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US