In the foothills of the Andes, in the Sierra Piura region of Peru, the problems faced by coffee farmers are clear. Up to 6,600 farmers produce here for the Central Piurana de Cafetaleros cooperative (CEPICAFE), growing 4,000 tonnes a year of the finest Peruvian coffee on family plots scattered across the mountainside. Together, year in, year out, they bring in this special harvest, the arabica coffee cherries, which are painstakingly picked by hand, processed and dried in the sun.
However, thanks to “weather change,” a continual topic of conversation in the area, the harvest is unpredictable. Last year, there was too little rain in the region. This year there has been a deluge: in some areas an increase of 500 percent on the “norm.”
“I still think coffee is worthwhile,” 47-year-old Gusto Regis said. “It’s not yet as bad as 1983.”
That was when the El Nino weather system hit, and landslides and flooding drove his family away to find work laboring in an adjoining region.
“Of course we had no land and no money so we needed to come back. I don’t know what we would do if we had to leave again,” he said.
In the neighboring village, Alejandro Reyes Ruiz talks his co-farmers through a giant diagram he has drawn explaining likely “weather changes.” Paul Santos Santos, a 24-year-old trainee teacher, sings an instructive song about climate and coffee. I explain that where I come from not everybody thinks that climate change exists.
“They should come here and try to grow coffee,” Alejandro said.
Peru is rated among the top three nations likely to be most affected by climate change in the world by the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research at the University of East Anglia.
In the Sierra Piura there have been many efforts to adapt, from the installation of a pulley system that takes coffee sacks across swollen rivers to fortifications of the local reservoir which have prevented two low-lying villages from being wiped out in a flash flood. However, as the uncertainties grow, so will the bill for tackling them.
A report published on Saturday by the UK’s leading ethical hot drinks brand Cafedirect (CEPICAFE is one of its suppliers) warns that the effects of climate change on arabica production are likely to lead to worldwide shortages and an exodus of small-scale producers from coffee growing. However the company, which was formed 21 years ago to protect small-scale producers from poverty after the price of coffee collapsed, has come up with a potential game changer: A unique way of playing the carbon market to the advantage of the poor that will fund long-term strategies to adapt to climate change.
Up in the Choco region, at an elevation of 3,100m, subsistence farmers — their lineage part Inca, part Spanish conquistador — are unexpectedly trading on the carbon market. In the village the air is full of the smell of wood stoves, which hints at what Choco’s big environmental -problem is: deforestation. As “weather change” hits, deforestation has exacerbated flash flooding. There is simply no buffer in Choco any longer and the coffee farmers 2,000m below are in danger of being wiped out as a consequence.
“Of course we approached the carbon market cautiously as it doesn’t have the best reputation and there was absolutely no blueprint,” Wolfgang Weinmann said, who is head of strategic development at Cafedirect and farmed coffee in Ecuador for a decade. Carbon-credit schemes are more associated with turbo-charged financial markets looking for a quick buck than with the poor on the front line, but as Cafedirect has worked with local non-governmental organizations, notably Progreso, they have built confidence.
In the nursery that nurtures the pine saplings that represent the first phase of reforestation (the next round will be native trees), it seems they might just have found a workable system that links poor people to the carbon market. For every tonne of carbon captured by the newly planted trees the community receives a carbon credit which can be sold later on the global market to the benefit of the community. In practice, Cafedirect encourages partners along the supply chain, such as Dublin-based Bewley’s which roasts the coffee, to buy credits.
Cafedirect’s report warns that the major multinational coffee retailers and brands must take urgent action too. This will be hard for multinationals to achieve without major change. Unlike Cafedirect, the big players do not have a relationship with their suppliers, as even fair trade beans are bought anonymously at market. Nothing short of a coffee industry revolution will protect the livelihoods of 25 million small-scale producers who produce 75 percent of high-quality coffee.
If Cafedirect’s project succeeds it could provide a blueprint for indigenous communities all over the world.
Peru’s vice president, Marisol Espinoza, said: “Climate change is a huge worry for us in Peru and we hope this initiative in Sierra Piura can be rolled out to other regions too. It is so important because Peruvian coffee is special. It protects biodiversity, and it’s about development of whole communities. It also has an amazing aroma and taste. That’s the taste of social justice.”
Back in Piura, at the coffee-processing plant — which exported 161,000 quintals (7,400 tonnes) of top-quality green coffee last year all over the world — they are gearing up for quality checks. They are acutely aware that in the international coffee market the “taste of social justice” does not necessarily cut it.
“Luckily, we have amazing quality too,” beams the factory manager.
In a few weeks the harvest should begin arriving from the mountain. The fight is on to make sure it continues.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers