The uneven strengths of the five candidates for chairperson of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is affecting the party’s leadership election. This disparity has led former DPP chairperson Hsu Hsin-liang (許信良) to launch an inappropriate personal attack on former premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) and it has overshadowed the political discussion to the point that the candidates have failed to share any insightful thoughts or visions regarding their China policies and strategies, the area that most interests everyone.
As the election campaign, full of explosive personal grudges, continues, a series of major international events closely linked to stability in the Asia-Pacific region as well as the wider political and economic order have taken place.
The first was a visit to Washington by Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda during which he and US President Barack Obama strengthened the US-Japan security alliance. The difference between Noda’s visit and the 2006 visit by former Japanese premier Junichiro Koizumi was that the latter included stability in the Taiwan Strait as a Japanese concern. Taiwan has since dropped off the political radars of both the US and Japan.
This was followed by the fourth round of the US-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue in Beijing. In response to the issue of Chinese human rights activist Chen Guangcheng (陳光誠), the US and China carried out some quick and careful mediation to avoid any major impact on bilateral relations and minimize the negative domestic impact within China. It is therefore little wonder that, during the meeting, Chinese State Councilor Dai Bingguo (戴秉國) stressed that the two countries will not form a “group of two” or work together to “control the world,” nor will they fight each other. Instead, he said, the two countries will cooperate and strengthen mutual communication to create a development model characterized by peaceful coexistence.
The main reason China did not want to be seen as forming a “group of two” was that it does not want to play a global game with US rules. By doing this China is able to shirk its international responsibilities while remaining on an even footing with the US.
Dai’s talk about cooperation had major ramifications for the situation involving former Chongqing vice mayor and police chief Wang Lijun (王立軍) in addition to the Chen issue that the two countries were already working on. Dai’s talk also impacts the four consensuses reached by Chinese Minister of Defense Liang Guanglie (梁光烈) during his visit to Washington in which he discussed increased strategic military and communication exchanges.
Over the past two years, the Obama administration has shown its determination to move back into Asia by getting involved in issues such as those in the Korean Peninsula and the South China Sea disputes. This raised suspicions in China and concerns that the US would cooperate with Japan, South Korea, Australia, Vietnam, the Philippines and India to counterbalance China’s regional dominance. However, China responded to the US’ presence cautiously. The reason for this is that China is at the crucial stages of a sensitive leadership change and therefore wants to maintain both internal and external stability.
An even more important factor is that pragmatists within the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) were able to pressure party hardliners and direct the handling of the issues surrounding former Chongqing chief, Bo Xilai (薄熙來) and Chen to avoid affecting China-US relations.
The Obama administration adjusted its diplomatic policy to make it clear to China its strategic shift of focus from the Middle East to the Asia-Pacific region was not an attempt to contain China but was rather aimed at ensuring stability in the hemisphere.
It was for this reason that Washington sought cooperation from China over North Korea and became involved in the South China Sea dispute. Even suggestions by some Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration redeploy soldiers and locate missiles on Taiping Island (太平島) have aroused US concern. Selling the move from the Middle East into eastern Asia to US voters is also helpful to Obama’s re-election campaign.
The US and China are major powers that have created a relationship through very careful diplomacy. However, in the debates between the candidates vying for leadership of Taiwan’s biggest opposition party, not one of them has mentioned how the nation should position itself in relation to the US-China balance.
Given that Ma has just been re-elected and is now suffering from abysmally low public support, Taiwanese hope to see the DPP do more than just monitor domestic politics. The international community, in turn, hopes to see the DPP carry out more serious self-reflection on its China policies following its defeat in the recent presidential election.
In essence, the basic China policies of the five DPP chairperson candidates do not differ very much. They all emphasize the need to confidently yet flexibly face the rise of the powerful neighbor.
While we can be almost certain of the outcome of the election, in the future the party must still include the complicated variables and changes in the US-China relationship and the strategic situation in the Asia-Pacific region when it discusses China policy. It must not continue to narrowly focus solely upon domestic and cross-strait policies.
Liu Shih-chung is director of the research center at the Taipei-based Taiwan Brain Trust.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers