The French election season is far from over, as the parliamentary elections will be held early next month, and their results will be decisive for the composition of France’s future government. However, as socialist Francois Hollande was elected president and polls indicate a probable victory for the Socialist Party in the parliamentary elections, a socialist government will dominate French politics for the foreseeable future.
Throughout his presidential campaign, Hollande repeatedly criticized the emphasis on financial discipline of the rescue packages decided upon by the 27 leaders of the EU in December last year. He also condemned the policy of the European Central Bank (ECB) to make price stability its primary objective.
His proposed solutions for the French economy are filled with socialist ideas, according to which the government should actively intervene in the market to create or encourage enterprises to create nearly half a million jobs, to maintain state enterprises intact, to increase taxation of the rich and to allow people to retire at sixty under certain conditions.
All of his actions and discourse have brought the world to suppose that, once he takes office, Hollande will refuse to implement the consensual financial measures decided unanimously by the EU leaders. Hollande also seemingly puts into doubt the ongoing austerity drive in the EU, which is a condition to comprehensively solving the eurozone crisis.
However, it is doubtful whether Hollande is really willing and able to find any alternative to this solution.
First, the average debt-to-GDP ratio in the EU is 80 percent, and more than 85 percent in the eurozone. Greek debt will reach nearly 350 billion euros (US$453 billion), or 160 percent of its GDP, before the end of this year, while French public debt is over 90 percent of GDP. Any country that abandons austerity policies and refuses to reduce its debt ratio will be immediately punished by ratings agencies and the international market, which in turn will shake its stock market and finance and disturb its economic order.
Conscious of this danger, Hollande avoided directly attacking austerity as a policy and instead said that the policy selected by French President Nicolas Sarkozy totally neglected the need for growth and job creation. He therefore promised to continue the reduction of the public debt at an average rate of 3 percent per year with the aim of balancing the national budget by 2017.
Second, Franco-German leaders have historically always been able to work closely to lead European integration and solve European crises in spite of differing political ideologies. There is no reason to suppose that Hollande cannot work closely with German Chancellor Angela Merkel to solve the eurozone crisis.
Lastly, the real difficulty in finding a definitive solution to the eurozone crisis concerns the search for economic engines that can stimulate growth and create jobs in the EU.
Leaders of the EU and its member states now have only two options. They can decide to expand the role and mandate of their central bank to the extent that the bank will share responsibility for economic expansion. The ECB would then be equivalent to a “European Federal Reserve” and adopt policies similar to quantitative easing to stimulate economic growth in the EU even at the price of inflation and devaluation of the euro.
All the member states in deep debt crisis favor this option, which was also indirectly promoted by Hollande throughout his presidential campaign. However, even if the ECB adopts some measures similar to quantitative easing to prevent the EU from sliding deeper into recession, these measures will be effective only for a short term.
In the long run, a majority of member states, including France, will need to turn to the second option: extensive structural reforms to revive their economies. Without a willingness to conduct these reforms, France will not persuade Germany to sacrifice its wealth and financial discipline to help neighbors that abuse their finances and enjoy much better welfare benefits.
Hollande should seriously look into details of former German chancellor Gerhard Schroeder’s reforms, namely the Agenda 2010 — between 2003 and 2004 — which restructured the German labor market and taxation system. Following these reforms, Germany survived the 2008 financial tsunami and became stronger throughout the eurozone crisis. Only after implementing such structural reforms in France can Hollande begin negotiating with German leaders on the new role and mandate of the ECB. Then, Franco-German cooperation can pave the way for a definitive resolution to the eurozone crisis and, once again, revive European integration.
Hungdah Su is a professor and Jean Monnet Chair at National Taiwan University and director-general of the European Union Centre in Taiwan.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past
President-elect William Lai (賴清德) is to accede to the presidency this month at a time when the international order is in its greatest flux in three decades. Lai must navigate the ship of state through the choppy waters of an assertive China that is refusing to play by the rules, challenging the territorial claims of multiple nations and increasing its pressure on Taiwan. It is widely held in democratic capitals that Taiwan is important to the maintenance and survival of the liberal international order. Taiwan is strategically located, hemming China’s People’s Liberation Army inside the first island chain, preventing it from