The French election season is far from over, as the parliamentary elections will be held early next month, and their results will be decisive for the composition of France’s future government. However, as socialist Francois Hollande was elected president and polls indicate a probable victory for the Socialist Party in the parliamentary elections, a socialist government will dominate French politics for the foreseeable future.
Throughout his presidential campaign, Hollande repeatedly criticized the emphasis on financial discipline of the rescue packages decided upon by the 27 leaders of the EU in December last year. He also condemned the policy of the European Central Bank (ECB) to make price stability its primary objective.
His proposed solutions for the French economy are filled with socialist ideas, according to which the government should actively intervene in the market to create or encourage enterprises to create nearly half a million jobs, to maintain state enterprises intact, to increase taxation of the rich and to allow people to retire at sixty under certain conditions.
All of his actions and discourse have brought the world to suppose that, once he takes office, Hollande will refuse to implement the consensual financial measures decided unanimously by the EU leaders. Hollande also seemingly puts into doubt the ongoing austerity drive in the EU, which is a condition to comprehensively solving the eurozone crisis.
However, it is doubtful whether Hollande is really willing and able to find any alternative to this solution.
First, the average debt-to-GDP ratio in the EU is 80 percent, and more than 85 percent in the eurozone. Greek debt will reach nearly 350 billion euros (US$453 billion), or 160 percent of its GDP, before the end of this year, while French public debt is over 90 percent of GDP. Any country that abandons austerity policies and refuses to reduce its debt ratio will be immediately punished by ratings agencies and the international market, which in turn will shake its stock market and finance and disturb its economic order.
Conscious of this danger, Hollande avoided directly attacking austerity as a policy and instead said that the policy selected by French President Nicolas Sarkozy totally neglected the need for growth and job creation. He therefore promised to continue the reduction of the public debt at an average rate of 3 percent per year with the aim of balancing the national budget by 2017.
Second, Franco-German leaders have historically always been able to work closely to lead European integration and solve European crises in spite of differing political ideologies. There is no reason to suppose that Hollande cannot work closely with German Chancellor Angela Merkel to solve the eurozone crisis.
Lastly, the real difficulty in finding a definitive solution to the eurozone crisis concerns the search for economic engines that can stimulate growth and create jobs in the EU.
Leaders of the EU and its member states now have only two options. They can decide to expand the role and mandate of their central bank to the extent that the bank will share responsibility for economic expansion. The ECB would then be equivalent to a “European Federal Reserve” and adopt policies similar to quantitative easing to stimulate economic growth in the EU even at the price of inflation and devaluation of the euro.
All the member states in deep debt crisis favor this option, which was also indirectly promoted by Hollande throughout his presidential campaign. However, even if the ECB adopts some measures similar to quantitative easing to prevent the EU from sliding deeper into recession, these measures will be effective only for a short term.
In the long run, a majority of member states, including France, will need to turn to the second option: extensive structural reforms to revive their economies. Without a willingness to conduct these reforms, France will not persuade Germany to sacrifice its wealth and financial discipline to help neighbors that abuse their finances and enjoy much better welfare benefits.
Hollande should seriously look into details of former German chancellor Gerhard Schroeder’s reforms, namely the Agenda 2010 — between 2003 and 2004 — which restructured the German labor market and taxation system. Following these reforms, Germany survived the 2008 financial tsunami and became stronger throughout the eurozone crisis. Only after implementing such structural reforms in France can Hollande begin negotiating with German leaders on the new role and mandate of the ECB. Then, Franco-German cooperation can pave the way for a definitive resolution to the eurozone crisis and, once again, revive European integration.
Hungdah Su is a professor and Jean Monnet Chair at National Taiwan University and director-general of the European Union Centre in Taiwan.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers