“When written in Chinese, the word ‘crisis’ [危機] is composed of two characters — one represents danger and the other represents opportunity,” former US president John F. Kennedy once said.
After a series of recent government policy announcements that have prompted many to worry about the nation’s future and wonder where President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is leading Taiwanese, concerned citizens might look to the quote and think optimistically that all is not as hopeless as it seems.
Taiwanese have good reason for being anxious about the future and the nation’s well-being. For one, despite the discovery of a new case of mad cow disease in California late last month, the Ma administration shows no sign of softening its stance on its plan to conditionally relax the ban on imported US beef containing residues of the leanness-enhancing drug ractopamine, something that could potentially pose a health risk to consumers.
Then there was the government’s decision to allow fuel and electricity price increases, which further rubbed salt into the wounds of the many who have suffered the sting of stagnant salaries and a rising cost of living in recent years. The inevitable rise in retail prices has led many people to worry how the rising cost of living might further contribute to the list of family tragedies that have been served up at the newsstands in recent months.
Anyone who put their faith in Ma’s government, thinking it would eventually come up with something beneficial to the public, has had their hopes dashed — Ma, in an interview late last month, said he does not have to curry favor with voters now he has been re-elected.
It sends a chill down the spine to think the president could be so arrogant as to say such a thing in public.
As if this were not bad enough, data from the National Debt Clock, released on Monday, showed the country’s national debt has increased to about NT$5.23 trillion (US$178 billion) as of the end of last month — the sixth monthly increase in a row.
Fortunately, although Ma may no longer need to cozy up to voters, lawmakers still do.
Lawmakers of all parties need to be responsive to their constituencies. They must all heed the concerns, frustrations and grievances of voters in their respective constituencies if they hope to be re-elected in the next round of legislative elections.
This was seen on Monday when the Cabinet’s proposal to relax restrictions on imports of US beef products containing ractopamine residues was voted on by the legislature’s Social Welfare and Environmental Hygiene Committee.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Cheng Ru-fen (鄭汝芬), who opposes relaxing the ban, did not show up at the meeting, providing a good example of how Taiwanese, through exerting pressure on lawmakers, could still force the government to serve the public interest.
Ma may choose to remain oblivious to the people’s voice, now that there is no prospect of him having to run in an election again. However, the question all lawmakers who aspire to another term must ask themselves is: Do they want people’s votes in the next legislative election?
If the answer is yes, they are advised to search their conscience — and not simply follow the directions of their party chairman — when they cast their vote in the legislature on issues that matter to the nation and its people’s interests and well-being.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS