Another white-collar criminal (in this case sometimes white-collar) has disappeared after the verdict was handed down in his final trial and he had to report to the authorities to start serving a prison term.
Much as Thai newspapers have been filled for decades with stories about drivers involved in traffic accidents escaping by swimming a nearby canal, Taiwan’s judicial history over the past two decades is littered with prominent businesspeople or politicians who are nowhere to be found when it comes time to do their time. Many of them eventually resurface in China, the US or elsewhere, such as former Tuntex Group president Chen Yu-hao (陳由豪), former Kuangsan Enterprise Group president Tseng Cheng-jen (曾正仁), former Kaohsiung City Council speaker Chu An-hsiung (朱安雄), former Kaohsiung mayor and tycoon Wang Yu-yun (王玉雲), former Chung Hsing Bank vice chairman Wang Chih-hsiung (王志雄) and former legislator Ho Chih-hui (何智輝) — the list grows longer every year.
Now, former independent legislator Lo Fu-chu (羅福助) has presumably joined their ranks — “presumably” because no authority in Taiwan appears to know his whereabouts, except that he has not been seen in weeks. It is hard to believe that someone who relished publicity for so long — as demonstrated when he slapped and punched fellow lawmaker Diane Lee (李慶安) during a committee hearing after she reportedly accused him of being a gangster — is now willing to lay low.
Lo was placed on the wanted list on Wednesday after failing to report to prosecutors on Tuesday to begin serving a four-year term. The Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office said it received a petition from Lo on Tuesday asking for a reprieve so that he could file an extraordinary appeal, but prosecutors rejected it and issued 22 warrants for his arrest. His NT$10 million (US$339,000) bond was also confiscated and the prosecutors’ office said the statute of limitations on his case would not expire until December 2030.
The Ministry of Justice was quick to deflect any blame for the non-appearance of yet another high-profile convict by blaming the law. The ministry said the Code of Criminal Procedure (刑事訴訟法) prevents law enforcement from monitoring convicts’ telephone lines in the run-up to their reporting date, and prosecutors can only issue warrants if the convict fails to report for prison. The ministry said it would propose an amendment to allow prosecutors to issue warrants for major criminals as soon as the courts hand down final verdicts in their cases. It also wants prosecutors to be able to monitor convicts through electronic tags and other means as they await their final verdict.
Minister of the Interior Lee Hong-yuan (李鴻源) also blamed the laxity in the law regarding the period between when a final sentence is given and when the convicted must report to start their sentence. Lee said his officials would discuss the matter with their justice ministry counterparts, but added that in addition to the practical difficulties of monitoring all would-be inmates, the human rights of an inmate-to-be must also be respected.
Respect is all well and good, but it is the judicial system that needs to claw back some of that respect — and it needs the legislature’s help. If the law is too weak, it needs to be changed, immediately.
There are several ways to avoid this growing problem of no-shows among wealthy, connected convicts or even run-of-the-mill criminals: Cut down on paperwork by requiring immediate remand into custody upon conviction, instead of issuing summonses or warrants; institute greater use of electronic monitoring anklets or bracelets for those out on bond and awaiting a final verdict; and, in cases where there is a possible jail term of several years, travel bans and surrendering of passports should be an automatic requirement in the final trial phase.
It is time to stop counting the growing number of vanishing defendants and take action to prevent them from fleeing justice.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past