The uproar over the Wenlin Yuan (文林苑) project continues. I won’t add to the commentary, but will instead focus on housing justice, a key issue.
The reason this project has caused such a ferocious reaction is not that property rights are inviolable, nor is it only because of the forced demolition by the Taipei City Government.
A more important reason is that the government has long neglected to restrict real-estate speculation and allowed laws and policies that strongly favor developers. Furthermore, local governments have frequently used industrial zones and science parks as an excuse to expropriate land from poor farmers. Such long-standing violations of land justice have caused a buildup of resentment. In recent years, many students and academics who do not own houses have become involved in the struggle to protect land justice, and herein lies the key to the issue.
The project is in a part of town where land prices have soared because of proximity to an MRT station. This is why developers initiated the project. As with road construction in the past, the metro rail system has been a major factor in pushing up real-estate prices in Taipei. Public transport construction is funded by taxpayers, but the enormous profits accruing to the surrounding landowners go to a small group of people.
Given Taiwan’s low taxes, the profits from real-estate deals are a major reason why the tax system is unfair. A disproportionate part of the tax burden falls on wage earners, who help finance transportation infrastructure construction, while real-estate speculation makes owning a house a distant dream. Unfair taxes, combined with housing injustice, put a lot of pressure on wage earners.
This brings to mind a similar historical example. In the late 19th century, the mechanization of agriculture boosted wheat output in the US and reduced production costs, while the development of steamships reduced transportation costs dramatically. This made the price of US wheat in Europe very low, which made it increasingly difficult for many European farmers to make ends meet and in the end forced them to emigrate. The same ships that brought the wheat that destroyed their livelihoods carried the farmers to the US. Since the ships did not have to return empty, the shipping companies’ profits increased and further cut the cost of wheat transports, while the farmers became a major source of cheap labor in the US.
Today, the government uses taxpayers’ money to build the MRT system, a modern transport development, most users of which are wage earners with no chance of evading taxation. As the MRT pushes up real-estate prices, it is also pushing wage earners out of the city and forcing them to commute on the MRT.
A similar phenomenon occurred in London. To stop this from negatively impacting the city, the developers of big projects, assisted by the British government, are required to sell some apartments to people such as nurses, bus drivers and underground drivers, at low prices
However, this policy has not had much real effect. Taiwan’s problem is that our government will not even do that much. Instead, it chooses to strongly support land and money games. The profits from the land value increases end up in the pockets of developers and landowners, with no noticeable return to the public. The government doesn’t even dare to levy reasonable taxes on these exorbitant profits.
If the interior minister said the Wenlin Yuan project only appeared to be unjust, then the unfair tax system, government connivance in land speculation and the lack of public benefits must surely be concrete examples of housing injustice.
Li Shang-jen is an associate research fellow in the Institute of History and Philology at Academia Sinica.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US