In light of a recent slew of suicides, the government is mulling ordering stores to lock up charcoal to make it less readily available for people who want to commit suicide.
Considering that ingesting pesticide is a common form of suicide in southern Taiwan, the Department of Health said it is also planning on asking pesticide manufacturers to set aside NT$1 for every kilogram of product sold to finance the production of cabinets with locks, again aiming to make it more difficult for people with suicidal tendencies to get their hands on the product.
However, while measures aimed at lowering the number of suicides by making it harder for people to find the means to kill themselves are good, one hopes that government officials won’t be so naive as to think they’ve tackled the problem of a rise in suicides and can now relax.
People who truly wish to end their life could think of alternatives. Is the government going to ask stores to also lock away knives, sleeping pills and all potentially poisonous chemicals and ban high-rise buildings?
Life is precious and outsiders can only imagine the state of despair, pain and hopelessness someone might be experiencing if they feel the only way to deliver themself from the anguish and despair is to end their life.
People commit suicide for many different reasons, ranging from their mental state to relationship problems to job woes, for example, but after a quick look at the state of the nation, it is not hard to grasp why someone who is depressed, especially if they are underprivileged, may feel trapped and hopeless.
The unemployment rate remains high and salary raises remain a distant hope. The government has added to the public’s burden by announcing rises in fuel and electricity prices.
The increase in electricity prices is expected to have a trickle-down effect on virtually all goods and services, so price fluctuations are inevitable and spending will be affected.
Imagine the pressure ordinary people will face to cover increasingly expensive daily necessities, let alone the unemployed and the underprivileged who are already cash-strapped.
The crux in solving the nation’s climbing suicide rate is to tackle the problem at its roots. It calls for beefing up of social welfare, assistance systems and most importantly — government introspection on how to more effectively allot the social resources and emergency relief funds to the right people in a timely manner.
Rather than approaching the issue of suicide with desultory tactics such as locking away charcoal and pesticides, what is truly required of the government is to prevent thoughts of suicide from taking root.
The best way for the government to prevent suicide is to lessen people’s daily stress and pressure. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was quick to harp on the failures of the fomer Democratic Progressive Party in this area when it was in power, but President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration seems to have failed just as abjectly.
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing