The 1980s saw the US Republican Party in ascendance, with neo-conservatism under then-US president Ronald Reagan, followed by president George H.W. Bush, who won widespread popularity during the First Persian Gulf War. It took the US Democratic Party 12 years to gradually emerge from the cloud of defeatism it had been under.
In 1989, former US president Bill Clinton, then the governor of Arkansas, backed by the Democratic Leadership Council, united various members of Congress and state governors and established the Progressive Policy Institute. This institute galvanized progressive society, including academics, experts and civic groups, to reject dogmatic left-right approaches to politics, re-evaluate what the Democrats stood for and propose policy issues that motivated people, such as health reform, new creative industries and children’s education.
Clinton’s reform of the Democratic Party was known as the New Democrat Movement. His successful campaign against Bush in 1992 was famously summed up in the phrase “It’s the economy, stupid.” The key to the Democratic Party’s reform was getting congress and local government to work together and in getting wider social participation. Clinton was able to lift the Democrats out of the doldrums and capture the imagination of the electorate by proposing issues that had progressive values.
It seems that, since the end of Taiwan’s presidential election in January, there has been a sense of general dissatisfaction with the ruling Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), coupled with an antipathy for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). The government seems to be suffering from “re-election fatigue” even before President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has officially started his second term, earning the public’s ire with its prevarications and a series of price hikes. For its part, the DPP has failed to respond as quickly as it should to the KMT’s moves, or to fulfill its most important obligation as the main opposition party — that of providing checks and balances to the government.
The race for the DPP chairmanship officially started last week, with five registered candidates. Their proposals on how they intend to revamp the party will affect not just who ultimately wins the chairmanship, but also future interactions between the government and opposition, and indeed the balance of politics in Taiwan in the coming years.
During the early years of the DPP’s establishment, it was able to bring up issues of progressive values at crucial moments, whether the debate was on democratic reform or social justice. The party owes its very existence to this championing of progressive values, which saw it go from being a dangwai — outside the KMT — movement to an opposition political party to the governing party.
Now that it is about to enter its second four-year stint as the opposition, the party needs to open itself up and become more involved with the different forces of society, be they civic groups or academics. This is the only way it can make up for the paucity of its discourse over the past years, and enable it once again to influence the agenda.
Hopefully, this chairmanship election will focus on how to transform the DPP into a more modern political force, and not descend into a proxy war between different elements within the party. This country needs a robust opposition to prevent the unraveling of democracy. This is what the DPP should aim to do over the next two years.
Hung Chi-kune is a member of the Democratic Progressive Party’s Central Executive Committee.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95