President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) managed to dupe voters into re-electing him in January, but his second term in office does not officially start until next month. Ma is using this period to push through a series of unpopular policies, including relaxing the import ban on beef containing traces of the feed additive ractopamine, implementing steep fuel and electricity price hikes, imposing new taxes, opening the gates wider to Chinese investment and proposing the notion that China and Taiwan are two areas of a single country. This barrage of policy shocks has thrown Taiwan into disarray. It looks as though Ma’s plan is to lay the blame for all these unpopular policies on his subordinates so that he can begin his second term with his reputation intact.
Let us focus on Ma’s China policy. Two months have passed since then-Chongqing vice mayor Wang Lijun (王立軍) briefly took refuge in the US consulate in Chengdu, in China’s Sichuan Province. Following that incident, then-Chongqing party boss Bo Xilai (薄熙來) was removed from his post, and later from the politburo, and most recently, his wife was arrested on suspicion of murder. In the wake of these events, all kinds of rumors have been circulating about power struggles among China’s top leaders. The main reason why such rumors abound is that in China, where everything is done behind closed doors, various factions have been releasing information that they think will benefit themselves and allowing these rumors to circulate.
While China’s top leaders are busy handling their internal struggles, the lower ranks are trying to trim their sails and steer by the wind so that they do not end up on the wrong side. Given this situation, China’s policies on Taiwan are largely on hold, with decisions being left until the dust has settled. As top Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials in Beijing jostle for position in the run-up to the party’s 18th National Congress, which is scheduled for autumn, only minor adjustments can be expected in China’s Taiwan policies, lest they cause an upset in the leadership rankings. That would explain why China has not responded to the proposal for a cross-strait peace agreement that Ma made last year or the “one country, two areas” concept that his envoy to Beijing brought up more recently. China would prefer to observe what Ma says and does and gauge Taiwanese’s reactions.
Now that Bo has been removed from his government and party posts, Taiwanese businesspeople with investments in Chongqing are worried about whether his administration’s preferential policies will continue.
Although Bo’s successor has promised that these policies will continue, the worry is that Bo’s administration raised loans amounting to 500 billion yuan (US$79.28 billion) to cover extra spending intended to curry favor with the public and foreign investors, while Chongqing’s annual revenue is only about 100 billion yuan. In effect, the city is bankrupt. This news was revealed by Xinhua news agency journalist Zhou Fang (周方), who has been studying Bo’s -“Chongqing model” for a long time. Given the circumstances, it is questionable how long the policies initiated by Bo can continue. Ma and Bo definitely have something in common when it comes to this kind of governing style.
Since last year, about 30 Chinese-owned companies that, under strict US regulations, failed to make a profit on the US stock market have withdrawn from US stock listings and gone back to the more loosely regulated Chinese and Hong Kong stock markets.
Recently, however, several Chinese-owned private companies listed on Hong Kong’s stock market have seen their share prices plunge or have even been suspended from trading because of irregularities in their accounts, and the problem is still spreading.
After China lowered its annual economic growth target from 8 to 7.5 percent for this year, an increasing number of companies are likely to get into trouble. Care must be taken lest colluding officials in Taiwan allow these companies to list on Taiwan’s stock market and bamboozle Taiwanese investors out of their money.
In light of the current situation, Ma should help keep things calm by following the road safety motto — stop, look and listen. He should keep quiet and watch out for any changes in China’s political situation, especially whether it is swinging to the left or right, and then propose China policies that are most advantageous to Taiwan.
Unfortunately, however, Ma is running his government more like a circus, putting all his policies on show right down to the bottom line. With all of Ma’s cards on display, China can easily choose the best way to keep Taiwan under control.
Ma should put political issues related to China on hold and avoid making big moves on economic issues. What he should not do is risk hurting Taiwan’s interests by making over-hasty responses to China.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS