President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) managed to dupe voters into re-electing him in January, but his second term in office does not officially start until next month. Ma is using this period to push through a series of unpopular policies, including relaxing the import ban on beef containing traces of the feed additive ractopamine, implementing steep fuel and electricity price hikes, imposing new taxes, opening the gates wider to Chinese investment and proposing the notion that China and Taiwan are two areas of a single country. This barrage of policy shocks has thrown Taiwan into disarray. It looks as though Ma’s plan is to lay the blame for all these unpopular policies on his subordinates so that he can begin his second term with his reputation intact.
Let us focus on Ma’s China policy. Two months have passed since then-Chongqing vice mayor Wang Lijun (王立軍) briefly took refuge in the US consulate in Chengdu, in China’s Sichuan Province. Following that incident, then-Chongqing party boss Bo Xilai (薄熙來) was removed from his post, and later from the politburo, and most recently, his wife was arrested on suspicion of murder. In the wake of these events, all kinds of rumors have been circulating about power struggles among China’s top leaders. The main reason why such rumors abound is that in China, where everything is done behind closed doors, various factions have been releasing information that they think will benefit themselves and allowing these rumors to circulate.
While China’s top leaders are busy handling their internal struggles, the lower ranks are trying to trim their sails and steer by the wind so that they do not end up on the wrong side. Given this situation, China’s policies on Taiwan are largely on hold, with decisions being left until the dust has settled. As top Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials in Beijing jostle for position in the run-up to the party’s 18th National Congress, which is scheduled for autumn, only minor adjustments can be expected in China’s Taiwan policies, lest they cause an upset in the leadership rankings. That would explain why China has not responded to the proposal for a cross-strait peace agreement that Ma made last year or the “one country, two areas” concept that his envoy to Beijing brought up more recently. China would prefer to observe what Ma says and does and gauge Taiwanese’s reactions.
Now that Bo has been removed from his government and party posts, Taiwanese businesspeople with investments in Chongqing are worried about whether his administration’s preferential policies will continue.
Although Bo’s successor has promised that these policies will continue, the worry is that Bo’s administration raised loans amounting to 500 billion yuan (US$79.28 billion) to cover extra spending intended to curry favor with the public and foreign investors, while Chongqing’s annual revenue is only about 100 billion yuan. In effect, the city is bankrupt. This news was revealed by Xinhua news agency journalist Zhou Fang (周方), who has been studying Bo’s -“Chongqing model” for a long time. Given the circumstances, it is questionable how long the policies initiated by Bo can continue. Ma and Bo definitely have something in common when it comes to this kind of governing style.
Since last year, about 30 Chinese-owned companies that, under strict US regulations, failed to make a profit on the US stock market have withdrawn from US stock listings and gone back to the more loosely regulated Chinese and Hong Kong stock markets.
Recently, however, several Chinese-owned private companies listed on Hong Kong’s stock market have seen their share prices plunge or have even been suspended from trading because of irregularities in their accounts, and the problem is still spreading.
After China lowered its annual economic growth target from 8 to 7.5 percent for this year, an increasing number of companies are likely to get into trouble. Care must be taken lest colluding officials in Taiwan allow these companies to list on Taiwan’s stock market and bamboozle Taiwanese investors out of their money.
In light of the current situation, Ma should help keep things calm by following the road safety motto — stop, look and listen. He should keep quiet and watch out for any changes in China’s political situation, especially whether it is swinging to the left or right, and then propose China policies that are most advantageous to Taiwan.
Unfortunately, however, Ma is running his government more like a circus, putting all his policies on show right down to the bottom line. With all of Ma’s cards on display, China can easily choose the best way to keep Taiwan under control.
Ma should put political issues related to China on hold and avoid making big moves on economic issues. What he should not do is risk hurting Taiwan’s interests by making over-hasty responses to China.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US