Republican front-runner Mitt Romney is starting to hone his appeal to female voters, acutely aware as he turns to the general election that he has little choice but to narrow US President Barack Obama’s commanding lead among this critical constituency.
None too soon, say many Republican activists. They expect Romney, as well as his popular wife, Ann, to make an explicit pitch to female voters on the economy and jobs, their top issues.
The eventual nominee “needs to start recognizing the power that women voters have,” said Rae Lynne Chornenky, president of the National Federation of Republican Women.
Romney, a former Massachusetts governor on pace to clinch the nomination in June, if not earlier, acknowledges that the Republican Party faces a historical challenge in closing the advantage Democrats have with women.
Romney has won far more delegates to the Republican nominating convention than his challengers: former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum, US Representative Ron Paul and former House of Representatives speaker Newt Gingrich.
Like Obama, Romney sees pocketbook issues as the key to winning them.
“We have work to do to make sure we take our message to the women of America, so they understand how we’re going to get good jobs and we’re going to have a bright economic future for them and for their kids,” Romney said last week in Middleton, Wisconsin.
By Friday, Obama was making the same argument at the White House, where he hosted a conference on women and the economy. He presented a full review of the administration’s achievements on equal pay and workplace flexibility as new unemployment numbers showed an uptick in job creation.
“When we talk about these issues that primarily impact women, we’ve got to realize they are not just women’s issues. They are family issues, they are economic issues, they are growth issues, they are issues about American competitiveness,” Obama said, using his office to cast himself as a defender of women.
His Democratic allies are putting it more bluntly, saying that Republicans are waging a “war against women.”
Almost daily, US political discourse features some echo of this battle for women’s votes, whether from members of the House and Senate, the Democratic and Republican national committees or the presidential candidates.
Earlier this spring, the president called Georgetown University law student Sandra Fluke to reassure her after radio host Rush Limbaugh called her a “slut.”
Fluke had testified to congressional Democrats in support of their national healthcare policy that would compel her school to offer health plans that cover birth control. Republicans widely called Limbaugh’s comments inappropriate.
On Thursday, Obama called for women to be accepted as members to the all-male Augusta National, home of the Masters golf tournament. Romney quickly followed his lead.
However, the Republican’s challenge is stark.
Romney must overcome history, political math and the missteps of a party that picked a fight over one provision of Obama’s healthcare law and ended up on the defensive over access to birth control. Romney also has work to do with female voters after inconsistencies or misstatements on issues such as abortion and the future of Planned Parenthood.
Republicans have faced a “gender gap” since 1980, with women generally favoring Democratic candidates. A recent USA Today/Gallup poll found that gap lifts Obama to a lead across a dozen crucial states.
The poll showed women favor Obama by 18 percentage points, while men split about evenly between the two candidates. Taken together, that means women boost Obama to a 51-42 lead over Romney in those states.
There’s evidence that Romney faces a steeper climb among women than did US Senator John McCain, the Republican president nominee in 2008.
Washington Post/ABC News polls at roughly the same point in the political calendar show McCain was viewed favorably by 47 percent of women at this time in 2008, while Romney currently stands at 30 percent favorable among women.
Romney is convinced that women, like men, will vote chiefly on Obama’s stewardship of the US’ finances, so he tried to stay focused on the economy during this year’s battle over contraception.
However, some of his surrogates led the effort to cast the law’s mandate for birth control coverage as a violation of religious freedom, widely considered a lost argument that left questions about the Republican Party’s commitment to preserving women’s rights.
Romney might have dealt himself trouble with his inconsistent position over the years on abortion and a comment earlier this year that sounded as if he wanted to “get rid of” Planned Parenthood. His campaign later clarified that he was referring to deleting federal funding for the organization, not eliminating it outright.
Then there is the way Romney handles questions about his message to women; conservative Republican women say he has to work do to on that front.
Virtually every time, Romney answers by invoking his wife of 43 years and reports what it is she has told him about what women want.
“She reports to me regularly that the issue women care about most is the economy and getting good jobs for their kids and for themselves,” Romney told the Newspaper Association of America on Wednesday. “They are concerned about gasoline prices, the cost of getting to and from work, taking their kids to school or to practice and so forth after school. That is what women care about in this country and my vision is to get America working again.”
A few days earlier in Middleton, he was asked how he would counter the Democrats’ narrative on contraception.
He prefaced his answer this way: “I wish Ann were here ... to answer that question in particular.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers