The agreement by Taiwan’s Foxconn Technology Group to improve the lot of its 1.2 million workers in China who make Apple’s iPads and iPhones is a signal that China is losing its title as the world’s lowest-cost producer of everything.
It is not a pure economic argument, but an ethical one too that is gaining momentum following Apple’s unprecedented decision to allow the largest investigation ever into a US company’s operations abroad.
And after years of squeezing the profit margins of contract manufacturers making the gadgets beloved by consumers worldwide, the time is drawing nearer when big brand names might have to forgo some of their profits to overcome criticism their products are built off the back of mistreated Chinese workers.
“The time of low costs and cheap labor in China has come to an end,” said Jay Huang (黃忠傑), chief financial officer of Taiwan’s Wintek, a maker of touch panels for Apple and other brands with annual revenues last year of about US$3 billion. “People think the market should offer cheap products; in the past they came at the cost of cheap labor in China and workers’ rest time and welfare, but now we all agree that things have to improve and as an ethical manufacturer, we must improve the welfare of employees.”
Wintek has boosted amenities for its workers, including the installation of video conferencing to call their families. Another Apple contract manufacturer, Pegatron, has reorganized some workers away from single-task jobs into multi-skilled teams.
In a landmark agreement on March 20, Apple and Foxconn agreed to tackle violations of conditions among the Chinese workers assembling the iconic gadgets of the US firm.
Foxconn, which also makes products for other names, including Dell, Hewlett-Packard (HP) and Sony, agreed to the changes after the independent Free Labor Association (FLA) surveyed three plants and 35,000 workers.
Foxconn, whose flagship company, Hon Hai Precision Industry, is the main assembler of Apple products in factories in China, will hire tens of thousands of new workers, eliminate illegal overtime, improve safety protocols and upgrade workers’ accommodation and other amenities.
Apple is not the first big brand to respond to criticism over how its products are made. Nike made sweeping changes in the 1990s after being rocked by similar criticism.
China’s economics and policy direction now suggest workers are a more powerful force though. Labor shortages and double-digit wage inflation give workers more choice. They are more likely to jump to another job to secure higher pay.
The government has pledged to lift migrant factory workers wages to ease wealth inequalities in the country. In response, many manufacturers are shifting to cheaper inland regions to keep costs down.
“What makes it different this time is that there are more internal reasons,” said Zhigang Tao (陶志剛), a professor at the University of Hong Kong’s Faculty of Business and Economics. “In the past they were foreigners such as US labor groups who flagged awareness of China’s labor rights, but now the bigger driving force is from inside China — a rising yuan, social harmony and wealth redistribution.”
China has to change from low-cost and pollutive production to further its development.
“It’s a turning point for the whole country. It’s also part of the overall strategy to change to more domestic consumption and less exporting,” he said.
It remains to be seen how much major brands will give up so that their contract manufacturers can afford to upgrade conditions for workers.
Critics say there is often a gap between the rhetoric of high-flying corporate social responsibility and actual practices on the ground.
“In the past, there has been a brief moment of expose and outrage around revelations and promises are made. Then everything goes back to business as usual,” said Thea Lee, deputy chief of staff for the US AFL-CIO labor union group.
Hon Hai’s results show it produced a profit margin of 2.94 percent last year, down from more than 9 percent in 2001. Analysts say the profit margin on Apple contracts is possibly as much as 4 percent.
A teardown costing of Apple’s iPad 2 by electronics market research firm IHS iSuppli shows a version that retails for US$600 might cost less than US$300 in components and slightly less than US$10 for manufacturing, leaving Foxconn with less than 2 percent of the retail price.
“Even though I don’t expect dramatic changes, the critique right now helps contract makers to improve working environment,” said Charles Lin (林秋炭), chief financial officer of Pegatron, which also supplies Taiwan’s Acer and Japan’s Toshiba. “It’s a social problem, so it shouldn’t be just the contract makers’ job to bear the burden. They have to have enough profit before they can make the improvements.”
HP chief executive Meg Whitman, for one, recognizes that Foxconn might have little room to maneuver on cost.
“If Foxconn’s labor cost goes up ... that will be an industrywide phenomenon and then we have to decide how much do we pass on to our customers versus how much cost do we absorb,” she said in February.
Meanwhile, contract makers are looking for solutions.
In two factories, Pegatron staff work in a group and rotate through multiple tasks rather than doing a repetitive task on a conventional conveyer line.
“The pay is higher because of the multiple skills required in a worker, but then the productivity is also higher,” Lin said.
Pegatron had revenues last year of almost US$13 billion.
As well as the video conferencing, Wintek has added new entertainment facilities in worker dormitories, including weight-training machines, pool tables, table tennis and audio facilities.
It has even increased food choices, for example western-style breakfasts.
To be sure, there are skeptics who say any change will only occur slowly.
Debby Chan of Hong Kong-based activist group Students & Scholars Against Corporate Misbehaviour said the violations documented by the FLA had been known among non-government organizations for two years. So why had Apple ignored the issues for so long, she asked.
Small contract firms that lack a big backer such as Apple will be under less pressure to take action on wages and conditions.
“Market chatter is that Apple is paying for Foxconn’s pay raise this time; it’s like a marketing fee for Apple because it cares a lot about its environmentally caring image,” said Kuo Ming-chi (郭明琪), an analyst at KGI Securities in Taipei. “For smaller component suppliers who don’t have Apple paying the bill for pay raises, they face big cost pressure.”
In a country with a minimal social safety net, many Chinese workers are solely focused on pay. They take jobs that offer the chance for a lot of overtime, even if working conditions are not great.
“I think we will more see improvements in working conditions as workers have better choices,” said David Lee, a Hong Kong-based sourcing expert with Boston Consulting Group. “But the main thing that attracts Chinese workers is pay. People are much more focused on how much money they can bring home, rather than living conditions and working conditions.”
That is very much the view of one Foxconn worker.
“We are here to work and not to play, so our income is very important,” Chen Yamei, 25, who is from Hunan Province, said outside the Longhua plant in the south of China last week.
As for working conditions, she had no complaints.
“My brother owns a little factory here and the conditions are terrible,” she said.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers