Europe has opened a can of worms by trying to reconcile free trade with fair trade.
Under pressure from French President Nicolas Sarkozy, the European Commission on March 21 adopted proposals that could shut foreign companies out of bidding for public contracts in the EU unless their home countries provide similar access to European firms.
The EU executive, which has historically promoted free trade and opposed protectionism, insists the measure is intended as a crowbar to open lucrative government contracts in countries such as Japan, the US and China, not to close EU markets.
Public procurement worldwide, ranging from building roads and railways to supplying software and running data networks, is worth about 1 trillion euros (US$1.3 trillion) a year, and Europe’s market is far more open than those of competitors, the commission says.
Japan allows foreign bidders on less than 3 percent of public contracts and the US is only slightly more open. EU officials are irked by more “Buy American” provisions creeping into recent US legislation.
The plan has to be approved by the European Parliament and a qualified majority of EU governments, which is far from assured, but it has already prompted fierce debate.
Critics, especially the free-trading British, say the proposals send the wrong signal and would put Europe on a slippery slope toward fencing off markets rather than opening them.
A British government policy paper on trade published last year said the principle of reciprocity might sound “superficially reasonable,” but it could open the door to protectionism.
“The government does not think that the EU should close its own markets if others’ markets are not opened. This could weaken competitive forces, drive up costs and [in procurement] reduce value for money for the EU taxpayer,” it said.
RETALIATION
Germany, Europe’s biggest exporter, is also unenthusiastic, fearing retaliation against its cars, chemicals and industrial machinery, which are still conquering Asian growth markets.
Sarkozy, who has long banged the drum for trade reciprocity and branded Europe “naive,” has gone further and demanded that the EU adopt a “buy European act” similar to the Buy American Act reserving certain markets for domestic producers.
In an election campaign speech last month, he threatened to impose unilateral restrictions on public contracts if the EU does not act — a move that would breach European law.
Like many trade battles, the dispute pits the interests of producers against those of consumers and exposes the limits of Europe’s ability to spread its own system of rules-based governance worldwide.
A study produced for the French government argues that aside from public procurement markets, European manufacturers face a growing problem of “unfair competition” from countries with lower labor, environment and safety standards.
The report, entitled Ending Unfair Globalisation, by veteran industrialist Yvon Jacob and a French economics ministry official, Serge Guillon, repeats familiar complaints about China’s subsidized finance for companies, intellectual-property theft and exchange-rate management.
However, it also pinpoints issues such as the failure of European authorities to police the usage of the “CE” (European Conformity) quality label, meant to reassure consumers that goods meet EU safety norms.
In practice, importers put the CE stamp on products ranging from household appliances to toys that are rarely examined by national customs officials at the port of entry.
“It’s Europe’s own fault. Europe does not supervise its own market, which is the largest in the world,” Jacob, a former conservative lawmaker who calls himself a “liberal internationalist,” said in an interview.
“The European Union has imposed technical standards and safety norms on our own industry that don’t apply elsewhere and are not checked on imported goods,” he said, citing tires, lighters and chemical products as examples.
LOW INSPECTION
European tire manufacturers estimated that 15 percent of imported tires entering the EU market are below European safety standards, but no one inspects them, Jacob said.
When it comes to throwaway lighters, 76 percent of imports, mostly from China, do not meet the ISO 9994 safety norm that French producer Bic has to respect, he said.
The EU’s so-called REACH — Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemical substances — directive has forced European businesses to find substitutes for chemicals deemed unsafe, imposing costs that competitors do not face and inciting some companies to produce offshore at lower standards.
It costs aerospace company EADS 80 million euros a year just to change the paint on the wings of its Airbus planes to conform with REACH, while rival Boeing faces no such cost, the president of EADS told Jacob.
That is peanuts compared with the EADS aircraft sales that are at risk in another dispute over Brussels’ efforts to make foreign airlines flying into Europe buy EU carbon emissions permits. China has suspended the purchase of US$14 billion worth of Airbus jets as a result.
Jacob and Guillon want the EU to put in place quality controls backed by sanctions to enforce the EC label on imports.
They propose creating a European office for the surveillance of the internal market modeled on the EU’s anti-fraud agency and hiring more staff to follow up industry complaints of dumping at below-cost price.
Whatever the justice of their complaints, it is hard to imagine governments in gateway states such as the Netherlands, Belgium or Britain hiring armies of customs officials to filter Chinese imports more thoroughly.
The balance of power in Brussels is likely to remain with the free marketeers, because the EU treaty puts the European Commission in the driver’s seat on trade.
Even if the new public procurement powers are adopted, the EU executive’s agreement would be required to trigger them.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US