The newly elected Aung San Suu Kyi now faces a huge weight of expectations, but analysts say the inspirational dissident might have to temper her grand political goals and deal with bread-and-butter issues.
After decades in the political wilderness, the Nobel laureate finds herself in the position of being co-opted to legitimize the reform agenda and political system of the new military-backed government.
The veteran activist will have to sit down with her former foes to find ways to help farmers, promote investment and develop a country struggling to emerge from five decades of economic mismanagement under the military.
“Whether a minister in charge of a portfolio or a frustrated backbencher, her room for political maneuvering is smaller than as an unattached opponent,” Hong Kong University assistant professor Renaud Egreteau said.
Even if Aung San Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy (NLD) party wins all 44 seats it contested, it cannot challenge the huge legislative majority enjoyed by the military-backed Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP).
In addition, a quarter of the seats in parliament are reserved for unelected military officials, but for the first time after Sunday’s by-elections, the NLD leader will have a voice in the legislature, where lawmakers have for the past year been debating topics ranging from the national budget to healthcare and Chinese energy projects.
A Myanmar expert said Aung San Suu Kyi will have to be pragmatic and buckle down to tackling everyday issues, rather than the grander themes of democracy and constitutional change she championed in her campaign speeches.
“The current USDP parliament is quite energetic. They have done an amazing job in the past year, but their agenda is day-to-day, much more bread-and-butter issues that are the concern of the general population,” said Aung Naing Oo, an analyst at the Vahu Development Institute, a think tank in Thailand. “Aung San Suu Kyi has to talk rhetoric during the election campaign, but what she has said are not quite the day-to-day issues. The most important issue in our country is the economy and Aung San Suu Kyi doesn’t have economic credentials.”
One big question remains: Whether Aung San Suu Kyi could take on some kind of government role.
In January, presidential adviser Nay Zin Latt said there was “a possibility she will be appointed to the government.”
However, no other officials have since raised that possibility and Aung San Suu Kyi on Friday last week said she had no plans to accept a position as minister if it was offered, because by law she would have to give up her seat in parliament.
However, she did indicate that she might be willing to take on some kind of other role, possibly to help resolve the country’s ethnic conflicts.
Whatever she chooses, it is a long way from 2002-2003 when Aung San Suu Kyi, in between periods of house arrest, favored a more confrontational approach toward the junta, notably defying orders not to travel around the country.
Aung Naing Oo said Aung San Suu Kyi would bring prestige and influence to whichever role she chose, but her unyielding character could be an issue.
“She also brings her personality and her determination to the table. It would be like a double-edged sword for some of the people. She also can be problematic, so the key issue here is how well she can push her way in these uncharted waters, either in parliament or in government,” he said.
Some have in the past criticized Aung San Suu Kyi for what they saw as an intransigent approach to the junta, saying it resulted in a deadlock between the two sides, but Senior General Than Shwe, the junta chief who regarded her as his personal enemy, stepped down a year ago and the new generation of leaders is better disposed toward her.
Experts say the 66-year-old opposition leader must now look beyond her own legacy.
“No democracy can really build around one person,” said Thitinan Pongsudhirak, a political scientist at Bangkok’s Chulalongkorn University. “Now there has to be a shift to broaden the focus, not just to be on her, but her supporters, her new lieutenants, her party and other democratic institutions in Myanmar, including the ruling party, the incumbent regime.”
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past