Rabbi Shneur Kesselman estimates that he has been the victim of 100 or so anti-Semitic confrontations since he arrived in the southern Swedish city of Malmo in 2004. The latest was last week, when some young immigrants in a car spotted him on his way home after the evening service at the synagogue. The driver accelerated up onto the sidewalk as if trying to run him over.
Kesselman leads the Jewish congregation in Malmo, a town where many Jews are now afraid to wear a yarmulke or a Star of David in public. With his big beard and black hat, he stands out as an Orthodox Jew and is constantly spat upon, cursed at and threatened. About a dozen families in his congregation have decided to leave the city for Israel or the US, and the Simon Wiesenthal Center, named after the famous Nazi-hunter, has issued a warning for Jews visiting the town.
However, Malmo’s problems are not unique to Sweden. Anti-Semitic hate crimes are on the rise in many parts of Europe. In Germany and Austria, most such crimes are still committed by right-wing extremists, but, elsewhere in Western Europe, the increase reflects attitudes among young immigrant males — a finding documented by an exhaustive report released by the US Department of State in 2005.
FAMILIAR
The recent murders of four Jews — a rabbi and three schoolchildren — in Toulouse, France, constitute one of the worst anti-Semitic crimes of the past decade in Europe. We still know too little about Mohammed Merah, who killed seven people in total during his rampage, to ascertain whether he was affiliated with al-Qaeda, as he claimed, and we should be careful to draw conclusions about the cause and nature of his crime before the investigation has run its course. However, in the reactions to his killing spree, we see values and ideas that are all too familiar.
A few days after the murders, about 30 people, mostly women dressed in niqab, gathered in Toulouse to honor Merah’s memory. A schoolteacher in northern France asked her class for a moment of silence in his memory. Jewish graves were vandalized in Nice. In Sartrouville, walls were covered with graffiti saying: “Long live Merah,” “Vengeance” and “Fuck the kippa.” Merah was described as a martyr on the pages of newly established Facebook groups.
IMPORTED
We might not know much about Merah, but we are, unfortunately, increasingly well acquainted with this imported anti-Semitism, which is proving to be extremely difficult for European societies to confront. No one wants to blame or stigmatize another minority for anti-Semitic hate crimes, but Europe’s Jews are finding themselves in an increasingly difficult situation.
Europeans often choose to avoid the problem by viewing it as a conflict between two groups, with responsibility falling equally on both sides. When I asked Malmo Mayor Ilmar Reepalu about the threats against the city’s Jews, he claimed that the city’s Jewish community was being “infiltrated” by the Sweden Democrats — an anti-immigration party with roots in the Swedish neo-Nazi movement — with the implication that Malmo’s Jews were on an equal footing with the anti-Semites persecuting them.
popular notion
Reepalu had to retract his claim as soon as the interview was published. Yet he acted on the popular notion that anti-Semitic attacks by Arab youths in Europe are part of a cycle of reciprocal violence that yields a kind of moral equivalence.
Hate-crime statistics reveal a different picture. European countries — among them France, Sweden and the UK — experienced a sharp increase in anti-Semitic hate crime during the Gaza War in 2008-2009. In Britain, 317 attacks were reported in 2009, compared with 112 in 2008. In France, the number of violent attacks rose to 195 in 2009, compared with 50 the year before. There have been no reports of a corresponding increase in Jewish violent crime against Muslims. Indeed, such crime appears not to exist at all.
SCENARIOS
Two plausible scenarios follow. First, Jewish families, frightened of the future, will increasingly leave Europe for Israel or the US, underscoring yet another disgraceful chapter in the history of European anti-Semitism, albeit this time imported from the Middle East.
There are already indications of this emigration. According to the Jewish Agency for Israel, French Jews constitute one of the largest groups of immigrants currently moving to Israel, which the agency links to growing anti-Semitism in France. In 2003, for example, about 1,800 French Jews moved to Israel and 20 percent indicated that they might consider moving.
In the second scenario, the conflict in the Middle East is fully imported to Europe and young Jewish men meet the threat to their communities with equal force. This would result in escalating violence between Jews and Muslims within European communities.
Perhaps, as a third alternative, European welfare states should check their priorities.
France, Sweden, the UK and other European nations guarantee a long list of positive rights and entitlements for their citizens. However, they are failing to fulfill one of the core functions of any state: To protect citizens from physical harm, even when those citizens display their Jewishness in public.
Paulina Neuding, a lawyer, is editor-in-chief of the Swedish center-right journal Neo and an editorial page contributor to the Stockholm daily Svenska Dagbladet.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers