Last month, I called for the World Bank to be led by a global development leader rather than a banker or political insider.
“The Bank needs an accomplished professional who is ready to tackle the great challenges of sustainable development from day one,” I wrote.
Now that US President Barack Obama has nominated Jim Yong Kim for the post, the world will get just that — a superb development leader.
Obama has shown real leadership with this appointment. He has put development at the forefront, saying explicitly: “It’s time for a development professional to lead the world’s largest development agency.”
Kim’s appointment is a breakthrough for the World Bank that I hope will extend to other global institutions as well. Until now, the US had been given a kind of carte blanche to nominate anyone it wanted to the World Bank presidency. That is how the Bank ended up with several inappropriate leaders — including several bankers and political insiders, who lacked the knowledge and interest to lead the fight against poverty.
In order to break this tradition, and to underscore the critical importance of putting a development leader in charge of the Bank, I entered the campaign myself and I was deeply honored by the public support that I received from a dozen countries, and by the private support of many more. Kim’s nomination was a win for all and I was delighted to withdraw my candidacy to back him.
Kim is one of the world’s great leaders in public health. He has worked with another great public-health leader, Paul Farmer, to pioneer the extension of treatment for AIDS, tuberculosis and other diseases to the world’s poorest people. More recently, he has been president of Dartmouth College, a leading US university.
He therefore combines professional expertise, global experience and considerable management know-how — all perfect credentials for the World Bank presidency.
I have worked closely with Kim over the years. He is a visionary, seeing the possibility of providing care where none is yet available. He is bold, ready to take on great challenges, and he is utterly systematic in his thinking, designing new protocols and delivery systems for low-income communities.
He led the effort by the WHO to scale up AIDS treatment for people in low-income countries and he did an exemplary job.
The US appointment is not the end of the story. The World Bank’s 25 executive directors, representing 187 member countries, must now confirm the choice from among three nominees.
He faces a challenge from esteemed Nigerian Finance Minister Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala and former Colombian finance minister Jose Antonio Ocampo. Yet Kim is the overwhelming favorite to get the position, especially given his stellar global record of accomplishment.
The past month has brought other reminders of why the Bank counts so much and why I emphasized the urgent need to professionalize its leadership.
Tragically, the Malian government was overthrown in a military coup. Ironically, an election was scheduled for this spring, so the country was to have a new government soon.
I link the coup and the World Bank for the following reason — Mali is yet another example of a country where extreme poverty, hunger, disease, drought and famine cause political instability and violence. I know the country well. Indeed, the Earth Institute (which I direct) has a large office in Mali.
Several years ago, Mali’s government appealed to me for help to fight the country’s worsening poverty. I tried to rally global support for Mali, but the Bank and others barely responded. They did not see the dangers that were so evident to all of us working in villages around the country.
Of course, poverty is not the only cause of Mali’s instability. Ethnic divisions, the extensive market in weapons, spillovers from Libya’s violence and other factors have played a large role, but, around the world, poverty is the basic condition that accelerates and intensifies violence.
This year’s drought made a bad situation in Mali much worse.
I have been saying and writing for years that the dryland regions stretching West to East — from Senegal to Mali, Niger, Chad, Sudan, Somalia, Yemen, Iraq, Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan — are a growing tinder box, where climate change, drought, hunger and population growth are creating ever greater instability.
That instability erupts into war with terrifying frequency.
As a development specialist working on the ground in the drylands, I know that no military solution can stabilize this vast region as long as people remain hungry, face famines, lack water, and are without livelihoods and hope. Sustainable development is the only path to sustainable peace.
The US government is finally waking up to this new and frightening reality.
An assessment by the US’ intelligence agencies, released last month, argues that: “During the next 10 years, water problems will contribute to instability in states important to US national security interests.”
Of course, not only US security is at stake; so are global security, and the survival and well-being of vast numbers of people. There is no need to wait for the coming 10 years — the grim reality predicted in the report is already with us.
All of this underscores the importance of the World Bank and Kim’s role at the helm. The Bank can be where the world convenes to address the dire, yet solvable, problems of sustainable development, bringing together governments, scientists, academics, civil-society organizations and the public to advance that great cause.
This is a global imperative and we can all contribute to fulfilling it by ensuring that the World Bank is an institution truly for the world, led with expertise and integrity. Kim’s nomination is a tremendous step toward that goal.
Jeffrey D. Sachs is a professor of economics and director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University. He is also special adviser to the UN secretary-general on the Millennium Development Goals.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past