Release Chen Shui-bian
After reading Lee Hsiao-feng’s (李筱峰) column “Call on Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to use his re-election to pardon Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁),” (Liberty Times, March 11) my heart is so painful.
I have encouraged Reverend Kao Chun-ming (高俊明) to work on ways to get Chen released from prison.
Kao was scheduled to visit Chen, but he did not get approval from the authorities. This indicates that Ma’s heart is very cold and that he wants Chen to die an ugly death.
Chen used to be a noble president, but now he is gravely ill in prison and cannot be released for medical treatment.
This treatment is very cruel. It has been shown on TV that Taiwanese are concerned about Chen.
From the standpoint of protecting human rights we are calling on the Ma administration to release Chen as soon as possible to let him seek proper medical treatment and to recuperate.
Otherwise, the government’s claim that it complies with the UN’s covenants on human rights is meaningless.
I would also like to request that former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), as a Christian, speak out for Chen based on his Christian love.
Since Lee promoted Ma to a senior post in the past, Lee should let us know if he agrees with Ma in this case.
Chen’s treatment by the Ma administration is like cutting Taiwanese into pieces. This is not just my personal feeling — more than 46 percent of Taiwanese feel the same way.
I am a powerless 90-year-old housewife and as for releasing Chen, I can only pray to the one true God that I believe in, who created the universe.
I am praying that Jesus Christ will save Chen according to God’s will and that he will pass final judgement on those unjust cruel men. In the same manner, I would also like to appeal to all Taiwanese.
Do not be complacent with talk of the “status quo” — this will result in confusion and paralysis.
You can understand this administration from recent controversial issues such as importing beef with beta-agonist feed additives, covering up the outbreak of avian influenza and raising the price of electricity, gas and oil straight after the election. This administration does not want to treat Taiwanese sincerely.
After reading the article “What you do not know about the Taiwan Relations Act?” in the Tai-Sheng Report (台生報), I understand that the Republic of China (ROC) was repealed by the act. The act, an extension of the San Francisco Peace Treaty, has always existed and acted as a guideline for the relationship between the US and Taiwan. It states very clearly that Taiwanese and the alien authority — the ROC — are different entities.
In accordance with the act, Ma of that non-state, the ROC, has no authority to administer Taiwanese and he has no authority to put Chen in prison.
Politics works on reality. Putting Chen in prison is a political issue. I hope that experts in international law will advise Taiwanese how to resolve this issue.
Yang Liu-hsiuhua
Taipei
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS