Before the Jan. 14 presidential and legislative elections, I suggested to some non--governmental organizations that together with pan-blue, pan-green and academic groups, they should ask presidential and legislative candidates from all parties to sign a pledge to promote a party primary system similar to the one used in certain US states.
Such a system would require the government to organize primaries on the same day for all parties that pass a certain threshold. It would also allow people to participate in the democratic process at a different level.
There would be four main elements to such a system. First, people would cast a single ballot at a neighborhood polling station. Second, each ballot would be divided into sections listing the names of the candidates for each party without their photographs. Third, voters would only be able to choose a candidate from one party. Fourth, ballots with more than one party or one candidate marked would be invalid.
Because Taiwan has a household registration system, it would be easier to implement such a primary system than in the US, where voters have to register before they are eligible to vote.
Such a system could help increase political participation and solve the disputed nature of opinion polls and the lack of legitimacy in party politics. It could also help resolve the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) problem with dummy party members and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) problem with a few bigwigs who are elected each cycle without fail.
As far as these suggestions go, one organization decided to raise them with former DPP chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) so she could include them in her policy platform, but she never did.
Another organization said that this suggestion would not go down well within the DPP because some of the people in the central leadership owe their positions to dummy party members, and that while they might pay lip service to such a suggestion, they would then work to ensure it is never implemented.
The KMT and the DPP have both adopted primary opinion polls in some constituencies, which shows that both parties recognize the need for a fair mechanism to handle problems created by their existing primary election systems.
For the sake of party politics and democracy, legislators from the KMT, the DPP, the People First Party and the Taiwan Solidarity Union should take these recommendations on board and cooperate to push through an historic change to the nation’s electoral system.
Lin Chia is an economist.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers