Taiwanese have been shocked by media reports about a sex party held in a train carriage. Because the people who booked the carriage got together through the Internet and an underage girl allegedly played the “female lead” at the party, children’s welfare groups are once again calling for stricter controls to be imposed on the Internet. Some are even calling for a Taiwanese version of China’s “Great Firewall” to block overseas Web sites that carry undesirable content.
These ideas about Internet control are not in themselves impractical, and, at least from a purely theoretical point of view, such as may be held by people who do not use the Internet very much, there is nothing wrong with them — except of course that they would make Taiwan a laughing stock. One thing people might ask is: Why not also impose controls on mobile phones, since they are also sometimes used as instruments of crime?
The online business environment in Taiwan is pretty bad, the main reason being that the power to make policies and speak out about Internet issues is mostly in the hands of people who do not use the Internet very much. I have attended conferences organized by government departments to discuss Internet-related issues, and people who run online businesses are always in a minority. Instead, most of the people invited are academics. The problem is that the new issues that keep cropping up are not a focus for academic research in Taiwan.
The government’s definition of who is an Internet businessperson is also very broad. It would be very odd if the government invited LCD makers to a conference about memory chips, but it often does much the same thing in relation to the Internet. Internet businesses can roughly be divided into advertising, electronic commerce, online gaming, Web media, sundry online services, mobile phone Web services and so on. How can people who do not even understand these basic categories possibly make the right kinds of policy decisions?
However, the one thing that government and elected officials can always be relied on to do is to invite the most conservative civic groups to attend conferences on how to regulate the Internet.
There is no point in talking about how Taiwan’s electronics industry can be restructured to put software and cloud--computing services at the forefront if we do not have a robust Internet business sector. It also follows that there is no point talking about a robust Internet business sector if, every time a news story makes waves, a lot of moralistic people who have little or nothing to do with Internet business are given carte blanche to bash the hell out of Web services.
Although other countries have measures in place to regulate the Internet, few put amateurs in charge of professionals as happens in Taiwan.
Crude measures taken to regulate the Internet have stifled online business in Taiwan. The outcome is that Taiwanese use US-based Facebook as their favorite social Web site and Canada-based Plurk for microblogging. To watch videos they go to Chinese sites like PPS, Youku (優酷) and Tudou (土豆), and they post their views on Hong Kong discussion forums. Even Taiwan’s biggest Internet media portal — Yahoo — is foreign owned.
However, regulations have done nothing to stop Taiwanese users from downloading pirated music and movies, so the moralists now want the government to cut off access to overseas Web sites that provide such things. There are quite a few countries around the world that have done just that. A quick online search reveals which countries those are, and I don’t think Taiwan really wants to be listed among them.
On the one hand, the government is eager to get Taiwan listed as one of the world’s most competitive economies, but on the other, it displays a certain disdain for those factors that contribute most to competitiveness.
As far as the train sex party is concerned, there are plenty of ways of dealing with such abuses. The government could easily handle the case through the normal channels, without special new laws and regulations.
Even countries that strictly control online content do not have special regulations that get in the way of smartphone applications, but in Taiwan, people have not been able to buy apps from Google’s Android Market for nearly a year now. This negative signal makes a joke of the government’s much-vaunted plan to set up an app business zone. No sooner had some consumers lodged complaints than the Taipei City Government blocked app sales, with the result that the app development business has been put on hold across the nation. Evidently, the right hand does not know what the left hand is doing.
People in the know are very worried about the impact the cloud networking trend pioneered by Apple and Google is having on Taiwan’s electronics industry. It is a bit like when foreign steamships forced Tokugawa Japan to end its self-imposed isolation. Now, as then, there are plenty of traditionalists who would like to take the country back to the Middle Ages. Is that really the way Taiwan wants to go?
Shyu Ting-yao is chief executive of the Association of Digital Culture Taiwan.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking