Most people would agree that the nation’s tax system is unfair. The vehicle registration tax is a good example, with cars having the same engine size being taxed equally. That means the tax for a domestically produced car with an engine size of 2,000cc, priced at NT$800,000 (US$27,000), and that for an imported car with the same engine size, priced at several million New Taiwan dollars, is the same for both vehicles. The vehicle registration tax is in effect a regressive tax, making the poor pay more than the wealthy, which is unreasonable.
If the vehicle registration tax were set at 1 percent of the car’s purchase price, the tax on the types of cars normally used by the middle class would be lower than the current tax, while it would increase for luxury cars. This is in line with the principle that the wealthy should pay higher taxes, while giving the middle class some breathing space. Several environmentally friendly concept cars, electric cars or hybrid cars are more expensive and should therefore be granted some deductions to encourage the use of such cars.
The same logic applies to fuel, since fuel tax in Taiwan is a fixed annual sum paid according to engine size. Wealthy car owners use their cars more frequently and they therefore also use roads and other facilities more frequently. However, like the vehicle registration tax, they pay the same fuel tax as other car owners depending on the engine size. In short, the fuel tax is another regressive tax that makes poor car owners pay more than wealthy ones. The solution is to tax fuel usage. The more fuel you use, the more pollution you create. If fuel was taxed, those who use the roads more often and create more pollution would also pay higher taxes, which is in line with the principle that the user pays, while contributing more to environmental protection.
In addition, instead of the current program to subsidize taxi drivers who exchange their old cars for new ones, it would be better to award drivers who buy hybrid cars, a solution that is both more environmentally friendly and that saves on fuel usage. This could avoid demands for fuel subsidies from taxi drivers when fuel prices go up. Reforming the vehicle registration tax and fuel tax would both shift the tax burden to the wealthy and meet demands for environmental protection, while at the same time reducing taxes for the average citizen.
Yang Der-yuan is chair of National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology’s department of finance.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers