Reason in justice
Justice is the keystone of a democratic country. Just as the keystone holds together and distributes the weight of blocks evenly along an arch, the law is the equalizer that distributes justice evenly throughout a democratic society. Freedom is often regarded as the essential value. However, people commonly forget that nothing can preserve freedom except justice. You cannot have any freedom or equality for poor or rich, or for any race, without justice and the rule of law.
To maintain a stable society, the law is something that needs to be administered effectively by the justice system, including police, lawyers, procurators or judges and the government. Unfortunately, the Taiwanese justice system is still determined to a large degree by guanxi. The result is high levels of corruption and the privileges of relationship. Taiwanese can’t fully believe in our justice system, which causes a huge impediment in our continuing development toward full democracy.
Being law students means we are the ones who are likely to be administering the law in the near future. Therefore, those who study law are expected to fundamentally grasp the principles of justice under democracy, so that they are able to resolve disputes fairly.
However, there are many students majoring in law who don’t seem to understand the principles of democratic justice. They appear to only care about their academic grades and how to pass the exams as quickly as possible so that they can become judges. As a result, every day there are examples in the media of where citizens have failed either through ignoring the principles of democracy or of individuals favoring their own relationships or prejudices.
Many of my colleagues studying law say they are doing so to stand up for the poor and that’s the main reason why they want to get into the justice system. This is a noble idea. However, I cannot help but consider this answer somewhat short-sighted. Are the disadvantaged always innocent? Is it not a core idea of justice that the law is supposed to be blind with regard to race, creed, religion and income?
The law protects everyone, no matter what race he is and no matter whether he is wealthy or not. All people are created equal, especially in a just society. Even the disadvantaged who break the law need to face judgement. The law is supreme and there is no exception for anyone, rich or poor. When the law is administered arbitrarily, it ceases to be justice.
The authorities, the legislature and judiciary should operate justice according to the keystone principle of equality. They cannot correct the law or legislate just because of the common aspirations of the public, without the due process of law. This will eventually be to the disadvantage of our society.
Finally, from my viewpoint, the poor actually need more social welfare, care and education. However, when it comes to justice and law, our society should speak for equal democratic values as the best and long-term solution to help the disadvantaged. Reason must come before passion in a just society.
Hsin Ping-yang
Greater Kaohsiung
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers