Russia is planning another revolution. Moscow has pinned its future on transforming 400 hectares of nondescript farmland 30km west of the Kremlin into a base camp for the next generation of Mark Zuckerbergs.
By 2015 these desolate fields will be transformed into a city of 35,000 people and boast some of the most advanced research space in the world, if you believe the Kremlin’s plans. This is Silikonnovaya Dolina: Russia’s Silicon Valley.
It’s no pipe dream, according to promotional material handed out to British scientists, entrepreneurs and investors last week as part of a global mission to drum up interest in the Skolkovo Innovation Centre, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev’s pet project.
“We have plans to further explore the moon and the planets,” said a pamphlet promoting Skolkovo’s space center, one of five planned “clusters,” alongside information technology, biomedical science, energy efficiency and nuclear technology.
Sergey Zhukov, a cosmonaut who supervised research aboard the Mir space station and now heads the space cluster, said it “will not only allow thousands of people to implement their dreams of a spaceflight. It will also contribute to accelerate mankind’s technological development.”
Space is a key focus for Skolkovo, which is aiming to turn Russian ideas and scientific achievements into cash. While Russia is responsible for 40 percent of global space launches, it is far behind NASA in its ability to generate money. Output per Russian space industry employee is currently worth US$14,800 a year, less than 33 times that in the US.
The center, which has brought billionaire entrepreneur Sir Richard Branson on board, plans to launch a string of new satellites and a “new generation of rocket carriers that ensure low-cost space transportation.”
However, for now there is nothing there, although Viktor Vekselberg, the oligarch running the project, has assured potential investors that the groundwork has begun and the project will be completed on schedule.
Vekselberg, who is worth US$13 billion, according to Forbes magazine, has been drumming up international interest and investment in the project. Last week, his whistle-stop world tour visited Oxford, Cambridge and London.
The oligarch, who made his billions in natural resources and holds a stake in TNK-BP, the oil company part-owned by BP, told potential British investors and scientists at the Institute of Directors in London last week that the project was part of Russia’s attempt to diversify away from natural resources.
“Now is the time to move the economy to a new area, one where we are no longer reliant on natural resources,” he said.
However, Russia’s oil history casts a long shadow. The biggest deal Skolkovo signed in London last week was a £9.3 million (US$14.6 million) investment agreement with BP and Imperial College London. It is hoped the much-delayed deal will help build bridges following last summer’s armed raid on BP’s Moscow offices.
The Russian state’s history of interfering in international business is likely to be the biggest stumbling block in Skolkovo’s development. British hedge fund Hermitage was hounded out of the country and its lawyer, Sergei Magnitsky, died in jail after uncovering an alleged US$230 million fraud by police and tax officials.
British Labour Member of Parliament Denis MacShane has written to British Minister of State for Trade and Investment Stephen Green, also a former HSBC chairman, to criticize UK Trade and Investment, the government’s export adviser, for hosting the conference and warned of the dangers of legitimizing “a regime that is so plagued by criminality and corruption.”
“It seems irresponsible for British companies to be putting themselves in harm’s way without full disclosure about the tragedies that could befall them in Russia,” MacShane said. “The government should add an official health and safety warning so British businesses seeking to be involved in Russia do so with their eyes open.”
With reference to the Hermitage case, he said: “There has been a distinct lack of British government support when things go badly wrong.”
Vekselberg didn’t attempt to sugar the pill.
“We understand the Russian problem better than anyone. This is why we need your help,” he said. “London is a beautiful town, the UK is quite nice, but, believe me, Moscow is beautiful too and Russia is not too bad a country.”
The main aim of the project is to stem the tide of clever Russians fleeing overseas and taking their potentially money-spinning ideas with them. In order to encourage local geniuses to stay, the Russians will have to create an environment capable of attracting some of the best in the world. That will cost a lot of money.
Steve Geiger, an American brought in to run Skolkovo after he successfully set up a similar, smaller venture in Abu Dhabi, said the project marked a big change in Russia’s previous approach of “dumping money into a black hole” of research.
“There is a huge gap between entrepreneur and large-cap company. At present, there is very little reward for Russia’s scientific capital,” he said.
The main attraction — for both Russians and overseas scientists and investors — is likely to be cash. The project has already approved US$220 million of grants to 330 startups.
“We give free money — non-dilutive capital — you keep the equity and we don’t take a seat on the board,” Geiger told potential British investors. “That should be music to the ears of VCs [venture capitalists] here.”
The grants, which range from US$50,000 to US$10 million, are payable within two months if the startup has secured matched funding from a private investor.
“It’s not only for Russia,” he said. “It is funded by the Russian taxpayer so Russians should get most of it, but if we see a good idea overseas, we will invest in them.”
Investors are also promised corporate and personal tax breaks — and the opportunity of meeting Anna Chapman, the former spy and underwear model, who has been given the task of attracting young talent to Skolkovo.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers