Toward the end of this year, the 18th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will be convened to oversee a transfer of power from the party’s present leadership to the next generation.
Just as people were expecting to see the names of the new leaders emerge, we had the curious events of earlier this month, in which Chongqing Deputy Mayor Wang Lijun (王立軍) turned up at the US consulate in Chengdu, reportedly seeking political asylum.
The incident was met with a strong reaction in China and keen interest from abroad, as a conflict almost broke out between police officers from the two cities. The symbolic significance of all this and the tantalizing glimpse it affords of what is happening behind the scenes is indeed noteworthy.
The incident and the response should serve as a wake-up call to the few people in Taiwan who still view China through rose-tinted spectacles. It should help them face the fact that China is still a society on the edge, both politically and economically.
Ever since it was founded, transfers of power within the People’s Republic of China have been mired in the power struggles that are the necessary product of communist dictatorships. In the early days these power struggles were particularly ferocious, often going beyond internal party struggles to involve mass movements and even intervention by the army. They were enough to send the entire country to the brink of civil war.
In ancient times, transfers of power in China took the form of dynastic change in which imperial power was wrested from the incumbent. Not much changed when the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) took over, although it did so under the banner of putting an end to feudalism. Indeed, power transfers under this new regime were every bit as barbaric and violent, if not more so, than under the old system. With every transfer of power the contenders sought not just to topple their opponents, but to wipe out any trace of dissent, often getting ordinary people involved and leading to the imprisonment, or even death, of millions.
Following the death of former Chinese leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東), party, political and military power became consolidated in the hands of former paramount leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), who had very few, if any, serious challengers. Deng instigated a path of economic reform and opening up to the outside world and, under the name of socialist market economics, started China on the road of state capitalism and long-term growth. Where the economic system may have changed, however, the political system did not. There is a well-established system for the exercise and transmission of power, but it is exclusively controlled by a small, powerful elite.
The system of power transfer in the CCP operates in a way we might find difficult to conceive. The party’s second-generation leader, Deng, not only chose his successor, Jiang Zemin (江澤民), but also decided in advance who was to be Jiang’s successor: Hu Jintao (胡錦濤). Now that Hu is president, his own successor is all but decided, as Hu is presumed to have nominated Vice President Xi Jinping (習近平) to follow him.
This invention of the Chinese communists, these Chinese-style politico-economic development models that they call “socialist democracy” and “socialist market economics,” are just veils. In essence they are completely in line with Chinese communist ideology.
Market economics is a misnomer, as everything is still controlled by the state, not the market. State-run companies and the government call the shots in any given industry, including matters such as where domestic economic growth is to be concentrated, as well as overseas acquisitions, all of which are decided according to the CCP’s instructions. Notably, the Chinese government still lays out one five-year plan after another, through which it guides and controls the direction of economic development.
In politics, too, there is nothing that the CCP does not control. The party controls the government, and the party itself is under the control of a small political elite. Because the party leads the government, it is the ultimate source of power. It is in command of all executive, legislative, judicial and military affairs. Consequently, the National People’s Congress, which is supposed to be the equivalent of a parliament or congress in a democratic country, is really little more than a rubber stamp for the political institution that holds the real power, which is the CCP.
The core of power in the country as a whole is the Political Bureau of the CCP Central Committee, or politburo, while the Politburo Standing Committee is a core within a core. Each member of the politburo is responsible for a certain area or areas of business, and the general secretary is the one with the final say.
Although democracy often appears to be disorganized, it is actually quite a stable framework, especially as it allows change to come through the ballot instead of the bullet.
Compare this with the situation in China, where the state apparatus is in the hands of a tiny, unelected elite. Being unelected, the members of this elite have no mandate and no legitimacy. In addition, many disparate voices and interests are forcibly suppressed so that their needs and demands cannot be resolved within the system, and this sows the seeds of conflict and division. As a result of this long-standing suppression, China is riddled with internal contradictions, rather like a nuclear reactor that is weakened by cracks.
When someone as important as Wang presents himself, amid a power struggle, at the US embassy in Chengdu seeking political asylum, it shows that China’s political crisis is getting to a point where it could explode.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US