Forty years ago this month, former US president Richard Nixon made an historic visit to Beijng. On the prompting of then-US secretary of state Henry Kissinger, Nixon flew to China and the world has not been the same since. Neither has Taiwan.
To put things in perspective, Nixon’s visit was 19 years before the former Soviet Union collapsed and almost 17 years before the Tiananmen Square Massacre in Beijing.
Fast forward 40 years into the future — to 2052: What will the relationship between Taiwan and China look like then? And will China even exist as a communist state like it is today?
Taiwan watched in dismay as Air Force One made its slow descent into Beijing on that winter day 40 years ago. While Nixon’s trip was an important step in formally normalizing relations between Washington and Beijing, it also marked the first time a US president had visited China and it put US relations with Taiwan in an entirely new light. Taipei was put on alert and 40 years later, the geopolitics of the Asia-Pacific region are in the spotlight for all the world to see and ponder.
Nixon used his visit to Beijing to take his own place on the world stage and tell then-Chinese leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東) that it was time for the US and China to stop being “enemies” and “build a new and better world.”
Has that happened yet? Many observers in the West would say no, although how Taiwan deals with the issues involved is still being hotly debated on television talk shows and in news columns.
Today there are two “Chinas,” one communist and populated by more than 1 billion people, and the other a small island nation with a democratic backbone and a strong will to make its mark on history. So far, so good.
However, what does the future hold? Where do things go from here?
China still takes up a disproportionate amount of time and focus from US foreign policy strategists, while Taiwan has been left to endure being caught in the diplomatic nightmare that Nixon and Kissinger put into play.
In 2052, where will Taiwan be? It is something to ponder this month as TV news shows replay old footage of the Nixon-Mao meetings and talking heads on TVBS and CNN go at it.
Nixon remapped Taiwan’s place on the world stage with the stroke of a pen in Beijing in 1972. However, did he err on the side of fear and trembling, as many observers feel? Or did he — and Kissinger — see the future and act correctly?
Only time will tell.
Meanwhile, Taiwan is no longer on the sidelines of history and this proud democracy is forging its own destiny on the world map. Anniversaries come and go, but Taiwan is forever.
Dan Bloom is a freelance writer in Taiwan.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its