On the eve of the visit to the US of the leading contender to be the next president of China, a senior US admiral has laid out with refreshing candor his estimate of Chinese capabilities and intentions.
Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping (習近平), who is widely expected to become China’s top leader later this year, was scheduled to arrive in Washington yesterday. He is slated to be the guest of US Vice President Joseph Biden, but is also scheduled to meet US President Barack Obama and other political and military leaders.
Most likely by coincidence, US Pacific Command nominee Admiral Samuel Locklear III delivered his written assessment of China’s goals to the US Senate Armed Services Committee last week. He awaits a Senate vote to confirm his new assignment, then is scheduled to assume his new command next month.
In contrast to the laments about a “lack of transparency” in China’s military buildup from many US politicians, diplomats and military officers in Washington, Locklear was forceful without being provocative. He made the obligatory nod toward transparency that has marked US rhetoric recently, but then said what he evidently really thinks.
“The overriding objectives of China’s leaders appear to be to ensure the continued rule of the Chinese Communist Party [CCP],” he said, echoing the private assessments of officials with access to intelligence assessments.
To stay in power, Locklear said, Chinese leaders would seek to “continue China’s economic development.”
Locklear, who is scheduled to arrive at the US Pacific Command headquarters in Honolulu next month, referred indirectly to the frequent protests, particularly in rural areas, that have erupted recently. Thus another objective, he said, would be to “maintain the country’s domestic political stability.”
A third objective would be “to defend China’s national sovereignty and territorial integrity,” he said.
Chinese leaders have frequently asserted that Taiwan must be incorporated into China to preserve territorial integrity. The US supports self--determination by Taiwanese.
Still another objective would be to “secure China’s influence and status,” he said.
Some “Asia hands” contend that China’s rulers are seeking to revive the Middle Kingdom of yore with enough political, economic and military power to dominate Asia and drive the US out of the western Pacific.
Militarily, Locklear wrote: “China appears to be building the capability to fight and win short-duration, high-intensity conflicts along its periphery.”
“Its near-term focus appears to be on preparing for potential contingencies involving Taiwan and to deter or deny effective [US] intervention in a cross-strait conflict,” he added.
“Its modernization plans emphasize anti-access and area denial capabilities,” he said. That is known in Pentagon jargon as “A2AD,” meaning Chinese ballistic missiles to attack US air bases and naval facilities and weapons intended to destroy US ships and aircraft.
Locklear, who has been commander of US naval forces in Europe, said: “China is also devoting increasing attention and resources to conducting operations beyond Taiwan and China’s immediate periphery.”
“China looks to South and Southeast Asia as an area of strategic importance, which includes political objectives, access to resources, trade, and investment,” he wrote.
As Beijing deploys forces, particularly warships, to that region, the admiral wrote: “China will require “greater forward logistical capabilities to sustain operations.”
“China will encounter the same political issues the US faces in maintaining our overseas access,” he said. “This will require improving ties with states along the Indian Ocean littoral, closer cooperation with other regional navies, and will expose them to more non-traditional security challenges such as terrorism and piracy.”
“China is strengthening its nuclear deterrent and enhancing its strategic strike capabilities through the modernization of its nuclear forces,” Locklear said, adding that China “is improving other strategic capabilities, such as in space, counter-space, and computer network operations.”
Other Asian nations “are closely watching the growth of China’s military, and how its military acts,” Locklear wrote.
“There have been worrisome incidents in disputed waters in China’s neighboring seas that have caused concern in nations such as the Philippines and Vietnam,” he said. “Security concerns regarding Chinese military intentions have contributed to a greater focus on regional forums, such as ASEAN, where issues may be addressed multilaterally.”
On an upbeat note, the admiral concluded: “Such security concerns have also led to stronger and more welcoming relations with the United States as a security partner of choice.”
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US