Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection, Einstein’s reinterpretation of the cosmos through general relativity and the idea that we live in one of an infinity of universes are some of the most elegant and beautiful human ideas, according to a group of the world’s leading thinkers.
These ideas, and almost 200 others, were the subjects of a series of short essays collated by the Web magazine Edge, which invites people including scientists, artists, journalists, historians and philosophers to address a grand question every year.
For this year, Edge editor and literary agent John Brockman posed the seemingly simple question: “What is your favorite deep, elegant or beautiful explanation?”
The responses included established scientific ideas and theorems, maxims for the way societies operate, as well as considerations of what it means for something to be beautiful in the first place.
Richard Dawkins, the Oxford University biologist and author, led the charge in support of Darwin’s theory, which he said won hands down in terms of elegance because it had the power to explain much while assuming little.
“The ratio of the huge amount that it explains (everything about life: its complexity, diversity and illusion of crafted design) divided by the little that it needs to postulate (non-random survival of randomly varying genes through geological time) is gigantic,” Dawkins wrote. “Never in the field of human comprehension were so many facts explained by assuming so few.”
Frank Tipler, a professor of mathematical physics at Tulane University in New Orleans, chose the idea that there are an infinity of universes parallel to our own, containing individuals exactly like us.
“There are an infinity of Frank Tiplers, individuals exactly like me, each of whom has written an essay entitled ‘Parallel Universes,’ each of which is word-for-word identical to the essay you are now reading, and each of these essays is now being read by individuals who are exactly identical to you, the reader. And more: There are other universes which are almost identical to ours, but differ in minor ways: for example, universes in which you the reader (and I the writer!) really did marry that high school sweetheart — and universes in which you didn’t if you did in this universe,” Tipler wrote.
INTELLIGENCE OF ANTS
The collected intelligence of ants, and self-organization in general, impressed Stanford University neuroscientist Robert Sapolsky. Watch a single ant, and it does not make much sense as it walks in one direction, suddenly changing to another for no obvious reason.
However, a colony of ants is something special.
“Specialized jobs, efficient means of exploiting new food sources, complex underground nests with temperature regulated within a few degrees. And critically, there’s no blueprint or central source of command — each individual ants has algorithms for their behaviors,” Sapolsky wrote.
Out of this emerges a highly efficient colony.
A dilemma raised in 1980 by the UK academic David Collingridge was the chosen topic for technology writer Evgeny Morozov.
“Collingridge’s basic insight was that we can successfully regulate a given technology when it’s still young and unpopular and thus probably still hiding its unanticipated and undesirable consequences — or we can wait and see what those consequences are, but then risk losing control over its regulation,” Morozov wrote.
The idea, he said, set the tone of many subsequent debates about how people assessed technology and is unsolved to this day.
However, it is “one of the most elegant ways to explain many of the complex ethical and technological quandaries — think drones or automated facial recognition — that plague our globalized world today.”
BEAUTY AND ELEGANCE
The laws of physics featured heavily in the collection of essays. The chemist and writer Peter Atkins found beauty and elegance in the second law of thermodynamics, which says that all natural events cause an increase in the disorder in the universe.
“The astonishing feature of this perception of natural change is that the dispersal can generate order: Through dispersal in disorder, structure can emerge. All it needs is a device that can link in to the dispersal, and just as a plunging stream of water can be harnessed and used to drive construction, so the stream of dispersal can be harnessed too,” he wrote.
In total, the disorder of the universe will increase, but in specific places, “structures, including cathedrals and brains, dinosaurs and dogs, piety and evil deeds, poetry and diatribes, can be thrown up as local abatements of chaos.”
Some respondents, such as philosopher Rebecca Goldstein, unearthed deeper questions in their attempt to find beauty.
“Where do we get the idea — a fantastic idea if you stop and think about it — that the beauty of an explanation has anything to do with the likelihood of its being true?” Goldstein wrote. “What do beauty and truth have to do with each other? Is there any good explanation of why the central notion of aesthetics (fluffy) should be inserted into the central notion of science (rigorous)?”
For the author and former New Scientist editor, Alun Anderson, the concept of “deep time” was most elegant.
“The Earth is extremely old and the life of our species on it has been very short. When that idea first emerged it stood against everything that was then believed and it was to eventually change people’s view of themselves as much as the earlier discovery that the Earth revolved around the Sun,” Anderson wrote.
If we look into the abyss of time, Anderson said, “we may not grow giddy, but we can simultaneously feel our own insignificance in the Earth’s 4.6 billion-year history and the significance of the precise moment in this vast span of time in which we live.”
Kevin Kelly of Wired magazine and author of What Technology Wants found beauty in the fact that everything we know of on Earth is made from the ashes of stars.
“Where did we come from? I find the explanation that we were made in stars to be deep, elegant, and beautiful,” he said. “This explanation says that every atom in each of our bodies was built up out of smaller particles produced in the furnaces of long-gone stars. We are the by-products of nuclear fusion.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95