Housing bubble
In response to Michael Turton’s brilliant and well-researched letter, I would like to chip in with my expertise on the Taipei property market and try to explain why there is a housing bubble, but no social housing, in Taipei (Letter, Jan. 17, page 8).
First, there’s the concept of “mean reversion” that most Taiwanese investors, unlike FINI (Foreign Institutional Investor) funds, don’t seem to understand. People forget that the construction companies putting up these massive apartments have had gross margins of more than 50 percent in the last few years, putting cash in the pockets of the 1 percent and some lucky shareholders, a sure sign of mal-investment.
And what were these builders building? They’re building palaces for the mega-rich with marble walls, full-wall mirrors, large custom bathrooms and more. In some cases, four families could live fairly comfortably in one apartment. These people who think they are investing are really only speculating.
My chartered financial analyst and equity investor friend, “Mike,” went out to look at some places and he said, “they’re all super-nice, but way out of my budget.” If he says that, single and successful as he is, it is clear that there is a problem with housing in Taipei. I rent a rooftop bai-bai temple for NT$9,000 a month and consider myself lucky because my landlady living downstairs is bearish on renting it to a local, haha.
A housing “investment” that you don’t live in, unless you rent it out, is a risk. A big one. If you don’t find a buyer and sell higher, guess what you get? Pay attention to the housing catastrophe in China to see mal-investment everywhere.
What angers me is that every single law and project was approved by Taiwan’s incompetent carpetbagger government, with no consideration for the poor and, in an increasing number of cases, the environment.
Turning back the clock, I would have mandated that all new Taipei City buildings come with at least six floors of modest, but complete small apartments in a walk-up with nice balconies, the rest being up to the builder, and with an open-to-all pool, park and fitness center on each roof, loaded with solar power panels. Young, healthy singles or students could rent smaller apartments on the fifth and sixth floors, with families and the elderly below.
This building would have small shops on the bottom available for rent at reasonable rates. If all the recently-built super towers were like this, the price for retail space would not be going up. Don’t forget that Taiwan’s insurance industry is getting 3 percent returns on rent. With housing like I’m describing, if you build it, they will come.
The corrupt 1 percenters in the legislature have always passed laws that distort the market in many ways, allow land grabs at times just before harvest and drive profits their way. Don’t get me started on the National Stabilization Fund.
I strongly believe that the first countries that start to mark-to-market, instead of mark to disgraced financier Bernie Madoff, will be long-term winners. This Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government needs to come clean about the nation’s true sovereign deficit and adopt new policies that will help us with the inevitable reversion to the mean in the property market. That said, the luxury tax is working well, in my view, to get speculators out.
On a discouraging note, several weeks ago, a politician was talking about a new project, saying, “And the land for this social housing project will be sold to the highest bidder!” while he was dancing around in a paper-profits-induced jig and wringing his hands, according to a Google translation. Is this the KMT’s winning strategy for keeping the price down to help the poor in Taiwan?
Watch how this plays out in China. The “wealth effect” is so strong that not even I am immune. The minute any held-only property reaches parity on a downward slope, speculators and others who rode the uptrend will immediately stop spending and run for cover.
The world’s largest mall is empty, people. Mean reversion can be tough.
Torch Pratt
New Taipei City
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers