Laws to fight vote buying
I was born in Taiwan. Although I am now living in the US, I still pray that freedom and justice can prevail in Taiwan. One month before the recent presidential election, I called a relative in Taiwan. I told her that Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) appeared headed for victory, based on the news I saw on the Internet. However, she was not sure. She said that many people she knew had already received vote-buying money from a powerful political party. Now it appeared that she was right. Vote buying is a shame of Taiwan.
In the US, there is the Money Laundering Control Act as well as Suspicious Activity Reports to fight such acts. Any cash transaction of more than US$10,000 has to be automatically reported by the bank to relevant regulatory agencies. This is designed to make it difficult for illegal activities to evade detection.
I hope that Taiwan will soon fully implement similar laws and regulations to make it more difficult for rich political parties to buy votes with cash in any election. God bless Taiwan!
Chin Lee
Centennial, Colorado
Biological pest controls
Experts recently lamented the continuing use of rodenticides in Taiwan, which are toxins used to kill rodents (“Researchers urge poison-free rat-control measures,” Jan. 11, page 2). These dangerous chemicals are toxic to wildlife and humans, causing death through poisoning or cancer, and are one of the leading causes of the decline and likely extinction of the Taiwanese subspecies of the Australasian grass owl, the other causes being habitat loss, pesticide use and bird nets (“Experts fear for Australasian grass owl,” Oct. 1, 2011, page 2).
As usual, agriculturalists defend the use of rodenticides, claiming that there is no alternative to protect crops, while scientists claim they need “more knowledge about the Australasian grass owl’s behavior, current population and the state of its habitat.”
However, there is a proven method for battling rodents and protecting owls at the same time. In an excellent video on YouTube (www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJDVohcnfHQ), the use of barn owls and kestrels as biological control agents in Israel and Jordan shows that the introduction of barn owls increased crop yields by up to 24 percent, which adds up to an annual net profit of US$30 per hectare.
By placing thousands of nest boxes for barn owls and kestrels all over the Israeli countryside, these two bird species quickly decimated the rodent population and thus eliminated the need for rodenticides during the past decade.
A pair of barn owls catches between 2,000 to 5,000 rodents a year, but they are often limited by the number of available nest boxes. However, when nest boxes were provided and prey poisoning was stopped, this method of biological control was successfully employed in India, Malaysia, South Africa and the US, and has been used for protecting various crops such as alfalfa, citrus fruits, cocoa, dates, nuts, oil palms, rice, sugar cane, vine and wheat. Just do a Google search of “owl biological control.” There are now even commercial firms offering barn owls and purpose-built nests to farmers.
Farming organizations, nature conservation groups and the Taiwanese government should support more research and application of biological control methods because they create a typical win-win situation of sustainable ecosystem management: Biodiversity and farming revenues go up, while pollution and farming costs go down. What is there not to like about this?
Flora Faun
Taipei
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers