Saturday’s presidential and legislative elections ensured that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) will enjoy another four years of control in both the executive and legislative branches in the government.
Although the KMT maintained its legislative majority by winning 64 of the 113 seats, it suffered a net loss of 17 seats, while the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) picked up 13 additional seats, giving it the ability to propose presidential and vice presidential recalls, as well as amendments to the Constitution because it holds more than a third of the legislature.
While the legislature will largely be dominated by the KMT and DPP, the strong showing by smaller parties was an intriguing result. The combination of the nation’s nine smaller parties received more than 20 percent of the party vote.
Both the People First Party (PFP) and Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) made their way back into the legislature by meeting the 5 percent party vote threshold, securing both parties legislator-at-large seats. And although the Green Party Taiwan failed to pass the 5 percent hurdle, it managed to garner 1.7 percent of the party vote.
The strong performance by the PFP, the TSU and the other small parties reflected the voters’ desire for a legislature with diverse representation. While voters still largely stuck with the two major parties when choosing a presidential candidate, they showed they were much more willing to take a chance on a smaller party when casting their party vote.
As the new legislative session begins on Feb. 1, we fully expect both the PFP and the TSU to use their position on the legislative floor to monitor the KMT and the DPP despite each being classified as members of the pan-blue and pan-green camps respectively.
We hope the fresh faces from the two parties’ legislator-at-large lists, including financial expert Thomas Lee (李桐豪) and writer Chang Hsiao-feng (張曉風) of the PFP, as well as lawyers Hsu Chun-hsin (許忠信) and Huang Wen-ling (黃文玲) of the TSU, will bring new possibilities to the legislature.
For the KMT, it must carry out President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) promise of paying more attention to labor, cultural, educational and environmental issues, as well as the views of its own legislators from its legislator-at-large list.
The KMT’s 16 legislators-at-large are mostly made up of non-party members, including Children’s Welfare League Foundation executive director Alicia Wang (王育敏), Taiwan Organization for Disadvantaged Patients secretary-general Yang Yu-hsing (楊玉欣) and Environmental Protection Administration Deputy Minister Chiu Wen-yen (邱文彥). As advocates in various fields, the KMT’s new legislators need to take advantage of their governing position and live up to the public’s expectations by facilitating the legislation of bills that will address issues ranging from social welfare and tax reform, to judicial reforms.
The DPP, being the largest party in opposition, must make more of an effort to monitor the KMT’s legislative performance and pay greater attention to the Ma administration’s cross-strait policies, as many peopel are worried that Ma will move full speed ahead on closer cross-strait ties now that he has secured a second, and final, term.
Finally, Ma must not ignore the voters’ call for fair and diverse representation in the legislature, and he must work to put an end to backroom deals. He should remember the promise he made in his victory speech — that the KMT will work harder to seek cooperation from opposition parties in the legislature and act more humbly to pass legislation that is aimed at creating a better environment for all Taiwanese.
The Comedy Club on Fuxing N Road in Taipei was vandalized with paint bombs mixed with feces on May 29, allegedly because one of its performers had satirized Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The incident has triggered concerns about the growing threat from China’s cross-border repression within Taiwan. On the day of the attack, a comedian surnamed Huang (黃), who is known for mocking Xi, was the headline performer. The Comedy Club founder said the assault was obviously politically motivated. China, which Freedom House said “conducts the most sophisticated, extensive and far-reaching campaign of transnational repression in the world,” has
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson Zhu Fenglian (朱鳳蓮) at a press conference last week repeated the same, tired line, claiming that Taiwan’s future should be “decided jointly by the more than 1.4 billion Chinese people, including Taiwan compatriots.” The statement is absurd. Virtually every word is incorrect, with some parts mistaken to an astonishing degree. First, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never included Taiwan. When the Republic of China’s (ROC) original five-colored flag was established in 1912, Taiwan was still under Japanese rule. When the PRC was founded in 1949, Taiwan was under the control of president Chiang
Following the outbreak of conflict in Iran, TikTok was flooded with videos targeting Taiwanese users. Many featured artificial intelligence (AI)-generated anchors posing as Taiwanese broadcasters with localized traditional Chinese subtitles. The videos warned of imminent social collapse due to liquefied natural gas shortages, blamed the Democratic Progressive Party and its alleged failed energy policies for a fabricated crisis, and used recycled footage from unrelated events to create the impression Taiwan stood on the edge of systemic breakdown. By saturating the information environment with falsehoods or selectively edited material designed to trigger emotional responses, malign actors can exploit cognitive vulnerabilities and
Taiwan’s leading position in the global semiconductor industry is not, as some claim, based on misconceptions, a result of “stealing.” It was built upon formal, transparent and costly technology transfer agreements between the Taiwanese government and US enterprises half a century ago. According to the oral history of Hu Ding-hua (胡定華), a pioneer in Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, the origin of Taiwan’s integrated circuit (IC) technology dates back to the “IC pilot factory” in the 1970s. The implementation of this project fully complied with international commercial standards and legal procedures. First, the project completed formal contract signing and payment. In 1975,
RSS