Saturday’s presidential and legislative elections ensured that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) will enjoy another four years of control in both the executive and legislative branches in the government.
Although the KMT maintained its legislative majority by winning 64 of the 113 seats, it suffered a net loss of 17 seats, while the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) picked up 13 additional seats, giving it the ability to propose presidential and vice presidential recalls, as well as amendments to the Constitution because it holds more than a third of the legislature.
While the legislature will largely be dominated by the KMT and DPP, the strong showing by smaller parties was an intriguing result. The combination of the nation’s nine smaller parties received more than 20 percent of the party vote.
Both the People First Party (PFP) and Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) made their way back into the legislature by meeting the 5 percent party vote threshold, securing both parties legislator-at-large seats. And although the Green Party Taiwan failed to pass the 5 percent hurdle, it managed to garner 1.7 percent of the party vote.
The strong performance by the PFP, the TSU and the other small parties reflected the voters’ desire for a legislature with diverse representation. While voters still largely stuck with the two major parties when choosing a presidential candidate, they showed they were much more willing to take a chance on a smaller party when casting their party vote.
As the new legislative session begins on Feb. 1, we fully expect both the PFP and the TSU to use their position on the legislative floor to monitor the KMT and the DPP despite each being classified as members of the pan-blue and pan-green camps respectively.
We hope the fresh faces from the two parties’ legislator-at-large lists, including financial expert Thomas Lee (李桐豪) and writer Chang Hsiao-feng (張曉風) of the PFP, as well as lawyers Hsu Chun-hsin (許忠信) and Huang Wen-ling (黃文玲) of the TSU, will bring new possibilities to the legislature.
For the KMT, it must carry out President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) promise of paying more attention to labor, cultural, educational and environmental issues, as well as the views of its own legislators from its legislator-at-large list.
The KMT’s 16 legislators-at-large are mostly made up of non-party members, including Children’s Welfare League Foundation executive director Alicia Wang (王育敏), Taiwan Organization for Disadvantaged Patients secretary-general Yang Yu-hsing (楊玉欣) and Environmental Protection Administration Deputy Minister Chiu Wen-yen (邱文彥). As advocates in various fields, the KMT’s new legislators need to take advantage of their governing position and live up to the public’s expectations by facilitating the legislation of bills that will address issues ranging from social welfare and tax reform, to judicial reforms.
The DPP, being the largest party in opposition, must make more of an effort to monitor the KMT’s legislative performance and pay greater attention to the Ma administration’s cross-strait policies, as many peopel are worried that Ma will move full speed ahead on closer cross-strait ties now that he has secured a second, and final, term.
Finally, Ma must not ignore the voters’ call for fair and diverse representation in the legislature, and he must work to put an end to backroom deals. He should remember the promise he made in his victory speech — that the KMT will work harder to seek cooperation from opposition parties in the legislature and act more humbly to pass legislation that is aimed at creating a better environment for all Taiwanese.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS