Speaking at a meeting in central Taiwan a few days ago, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) noted that the suicide rate had fallen and that suicide was no longer one of the top 10 causes of death in Taiwan. Ma said that the number of suicides between January and September last year was 700 fewer than during the same period in 2010, and that he was astonished by the figures.
He opted to interpret the falling number of suicides as showing that his Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) administration had delivered security and peace of mind to the public, while criticizing the former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration for having presided over a relatively high rate of suicides. Ma’s comments stirred up a war of words between the rival pan-blue and pan-green political camps.
Frankly speaking, we in the medical profession were taken aback by what Ma said, and were left shaking our heads in dismay, because we who serve on the front line in hospitals have not noticed any discernible reduction in the number of attempted suicides we deal with. Further evidence comes from the Suicide Prevention Center, which reports that the incidence of suicide attempts continues to grow.
Of course, attempted suicide is not the same thing as death by suicide. They have different implications and are influenced by different factors. The attempted suicide cases mentioned above refer to people who were sent to hospital emergency rooms that are required to report such cases.
Such people are suffering so profoundly that, finding no other solution to their problems, they see suicide as their only means of escape. However, people who try to kill themselves do not always die. If high-risk cases are identified in good time and active measures are taken to treat such people’s problems (psychological or otherwise), there is a good chance of reducing the number who attempt suicide again and possibly succeed in killing themselves.
The fall in Taiwan’s suicide rate may have something to do with the setting up of a suicide prevention program in 2006. This scheme, which included the establishment of a Suicide Prevention Center, has had a definite effect, but it should be pointed out that it was initiated and implemented by the DPP administration of then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
Another thing that has had some effect is that Taiwan’s media have in recent times heeded the National Communications Commission’s demand that they should exercise restraint in reporting suicide cases.
There are other factors that might influence the suicide rate. One thing that most people are probably unaware of is that the way causes of death are classified can also have an effect on the figures.
Causes of death are broadly divided into natural and unnatural causes. Natural death cases are judged by doctors, whereas unnatural deaths are determined by prosecutors based on autopsies. Where unnatural deaths are found not to be a result of homicide, the cause of death can be further classified as suicide, accident or undetermined. The official figures for the number of suicides therefore depends on how unnatural deaths are classified by prosecutors.
Research suggests that there may be considerable variation between prosecutors as to the proportion of deaths they classify as being caused by suicide. A paper published some time ago in an international journal by a research team including Taiwanese psychiatrist Chang Shu-sen (張書森) said that many suicides in Taiwan might be hidden among the figures published for accidental and undetermined deaths, and that as a result the suicide rate could be underestimated by more than 30 percent.
The fact that suicide is no longer listed as one of the top 10 causes of death in Taiwan could also have something to do with a change in the way cause of death is classified. Starting from 2009, Taiwan adopted a newer version of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD), updating from ICD-9 to the revised ICD-10 code. An investigation carried out by the Department of Health showed that if cause-of-death statistics had been compiled according to ICD-10 instead of ICD-9 standards during the period 2002 to 2007, the list of the top 10 causes of death would have been somewhat different, and suicide would have fallen from ninth place to 10th on the list.
It can be seen from this that statistics given for the suicide rate should be examined with care. As long as the number of reported suicide attempts remains high, it can hardly be claimed that the government has given people security and peace of mind. A responsible government leader should understand the factors underlying such figures and take appropriate precautions when using them, rather than feeling smug about the statistics as they appear at first glance and claiming them as a political achievement.
Charles Huang is an attending physician in the psychiatry department at the Chi Mei Medical Center in Tainan.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers