A major local construction company’s surprising announcement last week that it would lower the prices of its presale housing projects by between 15 and 25 percent to boost sales has drawn mixed responses from inside and outside the industry.
Some critics wasted no time in saying other construction companies and land developers would likely follow suit, as a slew of government policies — such as a luxury tax on home sales and market transparency rules — have dealt a serious blow to the housing market.
Critics say this could be particularly true for companies that accumulated large land inventories at the peak of the market, which are under increasing liquidity pressure now and may need to take urgent, drastic action to clean up their balance sheets.
However, some say Highwealth Construction Corp’s aggressive pricing strategy is just an individual case, given that the two projects in question — one in Taipei City’s Shilin District (士林) and one in Neihu District (內湖) — are already overpriced.
So far, several other major construction firms have said they have no plans to slash presale housing prices in response to Highwealth’s move. Others have called Highwealth “immoral” and accused the company of hurting the industry at a time when it has been assailed by the government’s cooling measures and by negative macroeconomic fundamentals, both at home and abroad.
Although other companies have dismissed and criticized Highwealth’s move, it is by no means clear that the properties in question are fairly priced. The reduced prices — NT$900,000 (US$29,712) per ping (3.3m2) for the presale project in Shilin and NT$750,000 per ping for the project in Neihu — are still higher than average for the two districts.
Highwealth is a market leader, and not just because it was the largest buyer of land in Taiwan and the leading construction company by revenue last year — so it is no surprise that it should be the first to make potentially market-changing price cuts.
Whether other companies follow Highwealth’s lead remains to be seen, and it is also not yet clear what effect such cuts might have on the market as a whole.
Various factors are at play: First, should the number of property transactions continue falling and housing inventories remain high, developers of presale homes will face increasing pressure on their balance sheets and those without deep pockets are likely to cut prices first.
Second, once presale projects in general come under downward price pressure, any correction is likely to spill over to the market for existing homes.
Third, the outlook for the property sector also depends on the government’s ability to continue to curb real-estate speculation, as well as on consumers’ attitudes toward the housing market and their own personal financial situations.
If the government really intends in the near future to tax real estate based on actual transaction prices as it has previously claimed it would do, and if the government continues to curb the flow of hot money, the price adjustments will be here to stay.
At the same time, consumers need to realize that if Highwealth’s price cut sparks a downward correction, it will become a buyer’s market, and they can hold back on home purchases in anticipation of further declines. The Highwealth case may yet prove a watershed in Taiwan’s housing market.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US