Pressure mounts in N Korea
The unexpected death of North Korean dictator Kim Jong-il has brought fresh attention to that country’s uncertain future.
In the short run, observers have speculated that the North Korean leadership might initiate a military provocation to bolster new North Korean leader Kim Jong-un’s credibility. Farther off in the future lie a number of other possibilities, including further nuclear tests, an internal power struggle or perhaps even an economic and political collapse.
The regime in Pyongyang is as anachronistic as it is tragic. An entire nation has been shut off from the rest of the world, its population ruthlessly brainwashed to worship a senseless political dynasty that is driving the country ever further into poverty and isolation. And now power has been hastily transferred to an untested 20-something with no meaningful leadership experience.
Such a situation is fundamentally untenable. It is has become increasingly difficult for any society, much less an entire country, to isolate itself from the rest of the world. The process of globalization — the ever-increasing interconnection of national economies, cultures and societies — has lead to higher living standards and greater political freedom the world over, and those who are forcibly excluded from this process have sooner or later found a way to be included.
There are many ways this can happen. Perhaps the two most prominent ways are through popular uprisings and through the implosion of failing regimes, which simply collapse under the weight of their own ineptitude and backwardness. The Arab Spring is an example of the former, while the former Soviet Union is an example of the latter.
If history is any guide, it will only be a matter of time before North Korea is opened up to the outside world. However, exactly how this will happen is anyone’s guess.
Let us all hope that North Korea’s integration into the international community, when it does finally happen, is as peaceful and orderly as possible. If the arrogance, shortsightedness and recklessness of the late Kim Jong-il are any indication of his son’s pretensions, leaders of the free world have little reason to be optimistic.
Alex Jeffers
Taipei
KMT is a joke
I must agree that the timing was poor for the release of news that the US was considering Taiwan for its visa waiver program (“Waiver shows US support for Ma: KMT,” Dec. 24, page 1). The move only means that the US has said that Taiwan has finally met all the requirements to be considered for this program — it is not because President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is such a good leader.
The process began when former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was in office; it is not something that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) started. As a foreigner living in this country for more than 10 years and having watched the powers-to-be struggling here on a daily basis, I know that anything completed by the KMT was also blocked by the KMT when the opposition party was in power. You name it, they blocked it with their numbers. The purchase of military weapons comes to mind, for example.
Now the KMT wants to claim the credit for something that was started by the Democratic Progressive Party. I for one would not sell the upgraded F16s to the current government for fear that they would later be found with the Chinese flag stenciled on the side of them.
If the politicians from any other country lived here, they would see how scheming and conniving the current government is and the KMT is, and they would not in any way support them. This is the common feeling from many of my friends who live here, but come from other countries. Many stay here, like myself, because of the friendly people. Others stay here out of curiosity to see how long Taiwanese will put up with this nonsense.
I am pretty sure that former leader Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) would totally disavow the current government. He is probably turning over in his grave right now. The KMT has not had an original thought since the dinosaur age. Every time there is a major election with a lot at stake, the current government conveniently brings up charges through their puppets at the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office Special Investigation Division to use against the opposition party to cast them in a bad light. Then when the election is over, it all goes away. No foreigner is fooled and neither are Taiwanese.
The recent Yu Chang fiasco by the KMT and their puppet, Council for Economic Planning and Development Minister Christina Liu (劉憶如), who can’t seem to get the dates straight because she can’t remember which change she made, or when. How many years ago was this? Coincidence? Document transfers to the new “regime”? Three years later? How clumsy of someone. I would think that they need to be fired for their incompetency.
I could go on and on, but it upsets me to see this current government just always lying to the people and running up the country’s debt and taking away their civil liberties piece by piece.
We can’t fly the Taiwan flag when “friends” of the government come to Taiwan. It was reported that Chinese hackers hacked into photos of Facebook’s new headquarters and removed or altered the Taiwan flag from the photo (“Netizens blast tampering,” Dec. 26, page 2).
I agree with the statement made by one netizen who said: “President Ma Ying-jeou would order the national flags to be taken down when Chinese officials visit anyway.”
It can only get worse with the current government. Vote well and carefully, Taiwan.
Wei Bao-lo
New Taipei City
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers